--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
06:23 ---
Fix available, and not a binutils bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
06:18 ---
I'm reasonably confident this has been fixed, and this bug has been in "waiting"
for a long time.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2007-08-07 05:30 ---
What advantage will --all-init bring you over --whole-archive?
How would you define --all-init in terms of the linker? You are defining it in
terms of C++. But different C++ implementations handle static constructors
--- Additional Comments From cnmnzusoib at mailinator dot com 2007-08-07
05:17 ---
Apparently not. :-P
Now, disabling my bugzilla account -- that's *really* classy. Glad to know I'm
dealing with a
professional adult, not a hyperventilating dictator-for-life ("because I said
so, that
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
04:25 ---
This isn't a debating society.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-08-07
03:37 ---
Such a good, persuasive argument! You've raised many good points that I hadn't
considered...
OK then, lets call it an "enhancement", and I'll reword the summary for you.
The fact that this issue keeps comi
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
01:32 ---
m68k-coff is no longer supported. You'll need to use an older binutils.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
01:27 ---
As Nick says, current x86-aout scripts have . = 0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07
01:22 ---
Not a bug. Please do not reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-08-06
19:38 ---
Oh, I see. Without that unwinder patch, if the PC wasn't saved we'll
end up with a segfault. Since this is coming through Java, I assume
we're getting the unwinder re-invoked from the signal handler, a
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2007-08-06 18:59
---
I have posted an unwinder patch in the thread I referenced, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00312.html
but that was without ChangeLog entry, I got no feedback and forgot about it
(because in the meantime I
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-08-06
18:52 ---
HJ suggested this bug should be resolved before 2.18, but that was the day
before the glibc patch was identified.
Could someone explain to me, in small words, how Jakub's patch could "cause"
this if it
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-06 17:38
---
I changed the title to reflect that. What else must be done to upgrade to the
latest version?
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi Danny,
2. Cleanup in my_symbol_for_address. There's none now. Should there be?
Yes. :-)
Also it looks like my_symbol_for_address is going to quite slow for large
symbol tables. You might want to consider ensuring that the symbol time is
sorted by address and then performing some kind o
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-08-06 14:26
---
Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces
a spurious cross-reference in Info
Hi,
> I have reviewed the current version of the standards.texi file. Should this
> bug
> report be the one t
Hi,
I have reviewed the current version of the standards.texi file. Should this bug
report be the one that requests updating to the latest version of
"gnustandards", or is that in the project plan for binutils somewhere?
This bug report is fine.
Cheers
Nick
__
[Retry to send this message without the attachment that probably blocked
the earlier attempt.]
I've attached a patch that'll get objdump to report exception tables
correctly for ARM and SH4 which, according to MSDN, have a different
format for storing the pdata segment.
Here's part of the output
17 matches
Mail list logo
