--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-07-11 06:37
---
I think all of the following are wrong. This "ror" part of addressing mode 1
must
be instructions like 0x007Z for Z=0,1,2,3, ...
*not* 0x00fZ. <--- notice the "f".
< 3c0: 00f0an
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-07-11 06:33
---
I think all of the following are wrong. This "asr" part of addressing mode must
be instructions like 0x005Z for Z=0,1,2,3, ...
*not* 0x00dZ. <--- notice the "d".
< 340: 00d0andeq
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-07-11 06:22
---
OK. Here is first bug from the serious testing
"00b0 strheq r0, [r0], r0"
That should be "strheq r0, [r0], -r0" <--- notice the negative
cs
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-07-11
03:15 ---
$RM is used by libtool to remove files, so of course setting it to something
nonsensical breaks the build. So does setting a whole lot of other environment
variables. Not a bug.
--
What
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:35:03AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Did you try the patch I posted?
/me reads other email. I see you did. Applying.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lis
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:27:26AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> binutils-2.19 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.1 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.50.0.1 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.51.0.1 _end is 1000
>
> From the release notes:
>
> binutils-2.19.50.
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-07-10 18:46
---
Nick
Sorry this is the second time I sent out a false alarm. My guess is there is
some lag time between when your email notice arrives in my mailbox and the new
tarballs get posted. Hence, I end up pulling an
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-07-10 18:24
---
binutils uses libtool, and libtool uses -all-static instead.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From booleandomain at gmail dot com 2009-07-10
16:01 ---
It seems to work, thanks. But why do I need --static while all other packages
(gmp, mpfr, bash, ...) work with -static? Also, I think there should be a
document either in binutils sources or on the binutils
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
Hmm, having said all that, the following linker patch seems reasonable
to me and probably won't break anything else (always some risk).
Please test it for me.
Index: ld/ldlang.c
===
R
Setting the environment variable RM causes binutils build ('make') to fail.
You should be able to duplicate this by setting the environment variable
RM to anything nonsensical.
--
Summary: setting environment variable RM causes binutils build to
fail
Prod
On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Edmar Wienskoski-RA8797
wrote:
I understand your arguments, but there is something inconsistent
about this.
If I change the script to be:
_end3 = .
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-10 15:17
---
Subject: Re: New: cannot build binutils statically
Hi,
> I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with
> ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get:
Try adding a second dash
Hi,
I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with
../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get:
Try adding a second dash. ie:
../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="--static" && make
Cheers
Nick
___
bug-bin
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Edmar Wienskoski-RA8797
wrote:
I understand your arguments, but there is something inconsistent
about this.
If I change the script to be:
_end3 = . ;
. = _end3;
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-10 08:21
---
Hi Chris,
> Unfortunately, I must report that once again we need to remove instructions
> that don't belong like mrrc, blx, ldc2, usat, etc.
I am still not seeing this. You will have to show me a way to reprodu
16 matches
Mail list logo
