--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09
07:40 ---
Subject: Bug 11972
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2010-09-09 07:40:12
Modified files:
gas: ChangeLog
gas/config :
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:12
---
Hi Andrew,
The code I looked at already allows i[34]86 targets to see[1] these features.
Where exactly were you thinking that changes needed to be made ?
Cheers
Nick
[1] I said see rather than work with
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:16
---
Hi Alan,
Nick, I think you're just papering over the real problem here. Our handling
of
assignments inside ONLY_IF... sections is quite broken. To see more problems,
try the link with a map file. :-(
I
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09
10:38 ---
Subject: Bug 11931
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2010-09-09 10:37:48
Modified files:
gas/testsuite : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 10:41
---
Hi,
Thanks - that was great. I have converted the assembler source into a gas
testcase and checked it in to the repository.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From andyjstormont at googlemail dot com
2010-09-09 12:35 ---
The binutils sources I grabbed from Debian doesn't :\ I must have an old copy.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-09-09 13:01
---
Created an attachment (id=4973)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4973action=view)
proposed fix
Also late in the day so possibly suspect. Running tests overnight.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 14:24
---
Created an attachment (id=4974)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4974action=view)
Revised patch
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-09 14:25
---
Hi Carlo,
Further resting revealed some problems with the first version of the patch, so
I have uploaded a revised version. Please could you try this one out ?
Cheers
Nick
--
--- Additional Comments From mgretton at sourceware dot org 2010-09-09
14:56 ---
When running the same test I get the following output as the section header:
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn Flags
0 .interp 0011 8000 8000
--- Additional Comments From mgretton at sourceware dot org 2010-09-09
15:05 ---
Same results seen when using tools targetting arm-none-linux-gnueabi as when
seeing arm-none-eabi.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11995
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09
15:44 ---
aha, that's sufficiently clueful, thanks.I have
Contents of section .dynstr:
812c 00746d70 6469722f 6d697865 642d6c69 .tmpdir/mixed-li
813c 622e736f 006c6962 5f66756e 6331006c b.so.lib_func1.l
814c
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-09
16:38 ---
It failed with gcc 4.2.4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Gold failed to build
Gold, as of Thu Sep 9 09:24:40 PDT 2010, failed to build
on Linux/x86:
/net/gnu-6/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gold/object.cc: In member function
unsigned int gold::Sized_relobjsize,
big_endian::do_finalize_local_symbols(unsigned int, off_t,
gold::Symbol_table*):
Test results of memory_test.sh depends on versions of GCC.
On Linux/x86, GCC 4.2 and GCC 4.3 failed with
[...@gnu-6 testsuite]$ cat memory_test.sh.log
FAIL: memory_test.sh (exit: 1)
==
pattern LOAD 0x00203c 0x0*4000 0x0*603c 0x\?2a
0x\?2a
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat
/export/gnu/import/git/binutils/gold/testsuite/memory_test.t
MEMORY
{
region1: ORIGIN = 0x1000, LENGTH = 0x1000 ,
region2 (r):org = 0x2000, len=300
region3 (wx) : o = 0x4000, l = 4
region4 (!r) : o = 0x6000 + 60, len=
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-09
17:57 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00142.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11996
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11997
--- You are receiving this
In this scenario:
f.c
===
void f() {}
main.c
==
int main () { f(); }
$ gcc -c f.c
$ ar cr libf.a f.o
$ gcc main.c -Wl,--defsym=f=4 -L. -lf
the linker pulls in f.o from libf.a, even though f has been explicitly defined
on the command line.
As described here:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09
19:57 ---
Subject: Bug 11996
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2010-09-09 19:57:06
Modified files:
gold : ChangeLog object.cc
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09
19:22 ---
Subject: Bug 11998
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2010-09-09 19:22:30
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elf.c
21 matches
Mail list logo
