[Bug ld/12152] Many 64-bit Solaris/SPARC gcc -gstabs testcases fail to link

2010-10-22 Thread ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12152 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2010-10-22 10:32:03 UTC --- Created attachment 5078 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5078 corresponding object file -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=

[Bug ld/12152] New: Many 64-bit Solaris/SPARC gcc -gstabs testcases fail to link

2010-10-22 Thread ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12152 Summary: Many 64-bit Solaris/SPARC gcc -gstabs testcases fail to link Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 --- Comment #9 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola 2010-10-22 18:42:02 UTC --- The current binutils now gets the two previous tests right (thanks!), but it is still missing some cases. With the new testcase it encodes a je as 0f 84 02 00 00 00 Tha

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5024|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolutio

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5080|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2010-1

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5079|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5079|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 --- Comment #15 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola 2010-10-22 19:37:20 UTC --- The last "je" is the one that fits in 8 bits: je.LBB1_17 .align16, 0x90 .LBB1_17: -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?t

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-22

[Bug gas/12049] Unnecessary relaxation

2010-10-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12049 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-22 19:33:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created attachment 5080 [details] > The new testcase. > > Attached the wrong test previously. Please tell me which branchs should have 8bit displacement. -

[Bug gold/10708] "out of file descriptors and couldn't close any" -- probably fd leak

2010-10-22 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at google dot com -- Configur

[Bug gold/10708] "out of file descriptors and couldn't close any" -- probably fd leak

2010-10-22 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708 --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant 2010-10-23 01:05:41 UTC --- I've been trying to track down possible sources of file descriptor leakage. I've found one: In copy_relocs.cc, Copy_relocs::emit_copy_reloc(): typename elfcpp::Elf_types::Elf_WXw

[Bug ld/12030] assertion fail linker.c:2678

2010-10-22 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12030 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org -- Configure bug