http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-11-03 08:40:08
UTC ---
You are using the wrong target. m68k-linux is only compatible with m68k-linux.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #6 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-11-03
09:30:13 UTC ---
You are using the wrong target. m68k-linux is only compatible with m68k-linux.
(Neglecting FPU emulation for fido-elf: someone else can worry about
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Summary: explicite --enable-targets ./configure option breaks
mingw binaries.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12185
Summary: byte' might be used uninitialized in gold
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12185
yufanyufan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--
Configure
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-11-03 12:33:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 5107
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5107
testcase with precompiled binaries.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
hezekiahehud at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hezekiahehud at gmail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12186
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001
--- Comment #8 from Mark Mitchell mark at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-03
17:47:36 UTC ---
Nick --
Thanks for fixing this!
-- Mark
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
On 18 Sep 08:02, NEGISHI, Kiyoshi negishi at usa.net wrote:
Hi,
I believe that encoding old INTEL AVX FMA and AMD FMA4 is different
specifications.
in gas format:
vfmaddpd %xmm4,%xmm6,%xmm2,%xmm7
operand order is
vfmaddpd src3, src2, src1, dest
that's right?
gas encoding
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Daniel Jacobowitz drow at sources dot redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drow
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #9 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-11-04
01:01:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
fido doesn't have an MMU to my knowledge, nor an FPU. Trying to build Linux
for it is a bit silly.
I don't know of a
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708
--- Comment #10 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com 2010-11-04
00:08:46 UTC ---
I found another leak that will explain the problem -- if you're using the
--no-keep-files-mapped option (or a 32-bit build of gold, for which that's the
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #10 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-11-04
01:51:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Perhaps the issue with libgfortran on CPU32 is also academic. But academic or
not, binutils needs to be fixed for CPU32
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #11 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-11-04
04:40:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Which leaves my wondering how Thorsten was able to build libgfortran for
CPU32...
Did you build without optimization?
16 matches
Mail list logo