https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #10 from Angelo Graziosi ---
(In reply to Angelo Graziosi from comment #9)
Just for completeness,
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> >
> > Sorry about my previous post. You were right - the uploaded patch did not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16320
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ian at airs dot com|ccoutant at google dot
com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16321
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ian at airs dot com|ccoutant at google dot
com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16320
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16320
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 7561
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7561&action=edit
x86-64 foo.o
As of GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.24.51.20140425) 1.11, I still got:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr16320]$ ./ld.gold -s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16320
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME