https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17068
--- Comment #2 from thakis at chromium dot org ---
That seems to do the trick. I built ld-new from source and checked that my
build fails with that, then applied your patch and checked that it succeeds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #19 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
oops wrong link, the codesourcery toolchain which raised the assertion was
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/package12813/public/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-2014.05-29-arm-none-lin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #18 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the
latest testcase and pre-compiled musl-cross toolchain from
https://e82b27f594c813a5a4ea5b07b06f16c3777c3b8c.googl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17094
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17094
--- Comment #5 from Andre Landwehr ---
It seems that explicitly casting the result of bfd_set_section_alignment() and
the other macros that have that ",TRUE" section to void calms down the compiler
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17094
--- Comment #4 from Andre Landwehr ---
ahhh ok I see, I removed the ",TRUE" part of the statement in an earlier st
ep
because of this compilation error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./config -I./../include -I./..
-I./../
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #17 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the "host" (i.e. the machine the compiler runs on) is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
(sabotage linux using musl libc).
binutils 2.24 was built with these flags:
--target=arm-linux-musleabi
an
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17094
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
>From binutils-2.24 bfd/bfd-in2.h:
#define bfd_set_section_alignment(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->alignment_power =
(val)),TRUE)
How can that possibly be zero? Ditto for the current binutils inline function.
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton ---
... and yet the testcase compiles and links without any problems:
% make
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -std=c99 -nostdinc -ffreestanding -g
-fno-stack-protector -c -o libc/__libc_start_main.o libc/__libc_start_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17094
--- Comment #2 from Andre Landwehr ---
It does not fail, but it (correctly) returns 0. And when it does,
_bfd_make_section_from_shdr() returns FALSE, which is the problem.
Sorry for the unclear wording.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107
--- Comment #2 from allsey87 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 7674
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7674&action=edit
Test case
Test case including source code, output assembly and map file. Test case
includes a si
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107
--- Comment #1 from allsey87 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 7673
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7673&action=edit
Log from the configure script for GCC/BINUTILS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107
Bug ID: 17107
Summary: AVR Linker Scripts missing gnu.linkonce sections
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: l
14 matches
Mail list logo
