[Bug gold/17366] gold can't handle a crt1.o with an .eh_frame

2014-09-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17366 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug gold/14675] No eh_frame info registered in exception_static_test

2014-09-10 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14675 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail dot com ---

[Bug gold/17366] gold can't handle a crt1.o with an .eh_frame

2014-09-10 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17366 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/14675] No eh_frame info registered in exception_static_test

2014-09-10 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14675 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ian at airs dot com|ccoutant at google dot com --

[Bug ld/17369] New: The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2014-09-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Bug ID: 17369 Summary: The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment Product: binutils Version: 2.25 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug binutils/17329] Error: PC relative branch to label which is not in the instruction space

2014-09-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Thomas, > Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging > symbols (-g) that fails. > > So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue? Almost certainly. T

Re: [Bug binutils/17329] Error: PC relative branch to label which is not in the instruction space

2014-09-10 Thread Nicholas Clifton
Hi Thomas, Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging symbols (-g) that fails. So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue? Almost certainly. The bug is probably that gcc is generating a short version of a branch instruction (on instructio

parallel make potential problem in bfd/doc

2014-09-10 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Hi, It looks like the bfd/doc directory might have problems with parallel make if files need to be updated. Rules for updating the texi files look like this: aoutx.texi: chew.c $(srcdir)/../aoutx.h $(srcdir)/doc.str $(MAKE) $(MKDOC) ./$(MKDOC) -f $(srcdir)/doc.str <$(srcdir)/../a

[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

2014-09-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/17323] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

2014-09-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17323 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 17324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils ma

[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

2014-09-10 Thread fweimer at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com C