https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #58 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #59 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #54)
More crashers for `objdump -x`
Ok - I have updated the master branch with patches for all of these problems.
Please try it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #60 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7898
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7898action=edit
Proposed patch to fix valgrind's complaints about using uninitialised memory
(In
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #61 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
Created attachment 7900
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7900action=edit
More crashers for `objdump -x`
objdump is definitely getting harder to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #62 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
(In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #61)
Created attachment 7900 [details]
More crashers for `objdump -x`
objdump is definitely getting harder to crash.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17556
Bug ID: 17556
Summary: crashing when mixing SHF_ALLOC and non SHF_ALLOC
sections
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What is surprising is that the linker correctly patches the BL/BLX instru
ctions, itś just the address that is wrong. I´m wondering if this
can be fixed in the linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7901
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7901action=edit
Third readelf patch
Hi Alexander,
Please update your master branch and try
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17533
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 7902
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7902action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17533
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Alexander,
I have uploaded a possible patch to address the directory traversal issue.
(This is the same patch as the one posted to PR 17552). Please try it out and
let me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558
Bug ID: 17558
Summary: ld will follow DT_NEEDED when it is not necessary
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com cha
nged:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505
--- Comment #8 from Christian Bruel chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
sorry, the first test was only illustrative, but not completed. the fact that
the addresses are the same is just because I reduced the code.
Here is the complete attachment,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505
Christian Bruel chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7843|0 |1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #63 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #64 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Alexander,
I have checked another patch in. Please update your sources and try again.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
Yes, the check seems to be Ok in general. And the specific issues are fixed.
Two remarks:
- strip/objcopy don't remove temporary files and dirs when run on the test.a
from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17533
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
I've tried the patch from PR 17522. It fixes this issue too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553
--- Comment #5 from glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4)
$ ../ld/ld-new -mshlelf -shared --eh-frame-hdr -o test.so test1.o test2.o
$
Doesn't reproduce for me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #65 from Hanno Boeck hanno at hboeck dot de ---
Hi Nick,
If I use latest head and apply 7989 patch for valgrind warnings the number of
uninitialized memory issues valgrind reports is reduced, but they don't
disappear. I still get
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #66 from Hanno Boeck hanno at hboeck dot de ---
Created attachment 7904
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7904action=edit
remaining valgrind warnings
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553
--- Comment #6 from glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Some further tests with the same version of binutils on both sh4 and
cross-building on x86_64 using the two object files attached to this bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553
--- Comment #7 from glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de from comment #6)
Some further tests with the same version of binutils on both sh4 and
cross-building
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #67 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
Created attachment 7905
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7905action=edit
More crashers for `objdump -x`
Files: 9
Errors:
29 Conditional jump or
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Cherepanov cherepan at mccme dot ru ---
Created attachment 7906
-- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7906action=edit
More badness for `readelf -a`
Files: 16
Errors:
13 Argument 'size' of
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
.eh_frame 0x0500 0x80 test2.o
0xb0 (size before relaxing)
That says the duplicate CIE has been dropped, but not the FDE for the
30 matches
Mail list logo
