https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d21f123b0ead1806416cf0dafae12bec4cca8920
commit d21f123b0ead1806416cf0dafae
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
As
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #6 from David Li ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Li from comment #4)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to David Li from comment #2)
> > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|ccoutant a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to David Li from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > (In reply to David Li from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > > Since UNREF section is not referenced
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #4 from David Li ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to David Li from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > Since UNREF section is not referenced, it should be GCed. Am I missing
> > > somet
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to David Li from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Since UNREF section is not referenced, it should be GCed. Am I missing
> > something?
>
> Note that the section does not have
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #2 from David Li ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Since UNREF section is not referenced, it should be GCed. Am I missing
> something?
Note that the section does not have 'a' bit -- just like debug sections. Linker
won'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Si
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
David Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
Bug ID: 19446
Summary: BFD linker discards section without alloc section
attribute under certain conditions
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12658
Domani Hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Domani Hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18199
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Kwok Yeung
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=412d26bde8585eca3ec6b8bed70197205288cbdf
commit 412d26bde8585ec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19368
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Jiong Wang
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e48a6a3c4a4ae7a343dd54348d37bf9e0f246735
commit e48a6a3c4a4ae7a
16 matches
Mail list logo