https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #11 from David Li ---
No problem with this as long as ld does not throw away note sections.
thanks,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-
When building small libs/exec on ppc32 I usally get sparse files like so:
ls -lsh | sort -n
64K -rwxr-xr-x 1 jocke users 68K Jan 22 11:20 mgmt_alarmd*
64K -rwxr-xr-x 1 jocke users 67K Jan 22 11:20 ne_memd*
56K -rwxr-xr-x 1 jocke users 67K Jan 22 11:20 cp_dummy*
56K -rwxr-xr-x 1 jocke us
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
I missed a bit...
diff --git a/bfd/mach-o.c b/bfd/mach-o.c
index 72454f9..a712ff6 100644
--- a/bfd/mach-o.c
+++ b/bfd/mach-o.c
@@ -5798,14 +5798,16 @@ bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup (bfd *abfd)
if (md
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19446
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Xinliangli,
> However I do think ld's behavior is
> not correct here. Should linker first decide if some sections are 'root'
> sections that should not be throw away and then decide if other sections
Hi Xinliangli,
However I do think ld's behavior is
not correct here. Should linker first decide if some sections are 'root'
sections that should not be throw away and then decide if other sections should
be GCed? Here linker first prunes the references and then is forced to discard
section not b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10773
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
