https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19556
--- Comment #5 from vinay kumar ---
Updated patch is posted at below link:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-02/msg00153.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to h...@zytor.com from comment #26)
> When compiled in that fashion I cannot reproduce the original problem.
>
Please get the current binutils-2_26-branch branch from git and
find the smallest outpu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to h...@zytor.com from comment #24)
> ... and when linking with "-Bdynamic" without "-pie", ld removes all the
> sections related to dynamic linking when there are no undefined symbols
> which need re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #31 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
I have now removed the unused files from the Syslinux git tree.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-bin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
hpa at zytor dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.27 (HEAD) |2.26
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #30 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
tools/relocs.c isn't actually used, so it won't make any difference (I deleted
it from my private tree to verify, together with several other unused files.)
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 8968
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8968&action=edit
A patch for syslinux
Please try this patch for syslinux.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #28 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
When building *without* --disable-x86-relax-relocations then the test case I
submitted exhibits the problem that causes syslinux to fail to build: you can
see offset 0x30 (xyzzy_ptr) of with-pie/te
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #27 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
Created attachment 8967
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8967&action=edit
Test case for -Bdynamic without -pie
This test case shows how dynamic symbols are not exported with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #26 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
When compiled in that fashion I cannot reproduce the original problem.
However, I will shortly upload a test case for -Bdynamic without -pie.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to h...@zytor.com from comment #24)
> ... and when linking with "-Bdynamic" without "-pie", ld removes all the
> sections related to dynamic linking when there are no undefined symbols
> which need re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #24 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
... and when linking with "-Bdynamic" without "-pie", ld removes all the
sections related to dynamic linking when there are no undefined symbols which
need resolution, with the result that loading
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #23 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
So to summarize:
1. ldlinux.elf is an executable which does not depend on any other object
2. It does not require relocation
3. ldlinux.elf *includes* an ELF dynamic linker as well as a core libra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #22 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
The output file exports symbols to other ELF modules which are loaded
(ldlinux.elf includes the dynamic linker.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to h...@zytor.com from comment #20)
> What I'm telling you is that without either -pie or at least one undefined
> symbol *and* a shared library specified to the linker, all the dynamic
> sections dis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #20 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
What I'm telling you is that without either -pie or at least one undefined
symbol *and* a shared library specified to the linker, all the dynamic sections
disappear.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531
Stephen Kitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve at sk2 dot org
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
-pie is needed only if output has been PIC. Otherwise, you don't
need -pie and all symbol addresses will be fixed at link-time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #18 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
Note that despite the use of -pie the only reason for including that option at
this time is to export the necessary symbols. However, this appears to have
been there from the start in order to act
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #16 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
I have tried removing -pie (which shouldn't actually be necessary); however,
when I do so, ld no longer generates the sections which are necessary to export
symbols to dynamic libraries. The comma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
--- Comment #17 from hpa at zytor dot com ---
Created attachment 8966
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8966&action=edit
Linker script
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538
hpa at zytor dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|IN
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@linux-mips.org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Nathaniel,
> Can the test suite include binary files?
Apparently there is a way, but I am not familiar with it. :-(
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587
Ralf Baechle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@linux-mips.org
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587
Bug ID: 19587
Summary: Some of the less-well used targets won't compile with
gcc-6 due to static vars in opcode headers
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status:
28 matches
Mail list logo