[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 --- Comment #3 from hpa at zytor dot com --- The patch works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- You also can use --dynamic-list FILE Read dynamic list to specify which symbols to export. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1dab972d797c060e17229c2e10da01852ba82629 commit 1dab972d797c060e17

[Bug ld/19538] ld >= 2.26 breaks syslinux (bios) build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 --- Comment #44 from hpa at zytor dot com --- With that branch, Syslinux builds and runs correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mail

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 8979 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8979&action=edit A patch Try this with master branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/19516] microblaze: invalid symbol indices in GLOB_DAT relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516 --- Comment #2 from Rich Felker --- Created attachment 8978 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8978&action=edit proposed fix Producing a symbolic GLOB_DAT relocation for a symbol that has been made local/hidden by setting

[Bug ld/19516] microblaze: invalid symbol indices in GLOB_DAT relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added Target||microblaze*-*-* -- You are receiving t

[Bug ld/19538] ld >= 2.26 breaks syslinux (bios) build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8974|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pomidorabelisima at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug ld/19538] ld >= 2.26 breaks syslinux (bios) build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=21a90cf1dd5ddd22c2237b68fb58b8f532467a8c commit 21a90cf1dd5ddd22c2237b68fb58b8f5

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e20365c5d03f0f5eb341e04aafa88f30715e502e commit e20365c5d03f0f5eb341e04aafa88f30

[Bug ld/19615] [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgw at linux dot intel.com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug ld/19616] dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19616] dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 --- Comment #2 from Saul Wold --- The patch provided seems to address the problem, I am able to boot u-boot correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 hpa at zytor dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --

[Bug ld/19617] New: ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 Bug ID: 19617 Summary: ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug ld/19612] relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/17709] [2.26 Regression] elf/vismain test in glibc failed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17709 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 19612 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing li

[Bug ld/19612] relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Is this a dup for PR 17709 and > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 Well, Swift is build by clang, so gcc's PR65248 isn't relevant. Why do

[Bug ld/19612] relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Is

[Bug ld/19612] relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug ld/19616] dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|unassigned at so

[Bug ld/19616] dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 8977 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8977&action=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/19616] New: dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 Bug ID: 19616 Summary: dyn_rel_start, dyn_rel_end and other internal pointers are 0 when building u-boot for i386 target Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW

[Bug ld/19615] New: [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615 Bug ID: 19615 Summary: [2.26 Regression] We can't no longer export a symbol in PIE with local binding Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: n

[Bug gas/19614] gas for c6x prints "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" when gcc compiles things with it

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/19614] gas for c6x prints "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" when gcc compiles things with it

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bd5608dcc6a76876db06b1af1852252a4282aa2f commit bd5608dcc6a76876db06b1af185

[Bug gas/19614] New: gas for c6x prints "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" when gcc compiles things with it

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614 Bug ID: 19614 Summary: gas for c6x prints "Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections" when gcc compiles things with it Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 --- Comment #3 from louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com --- Note that movl$E@GOTOFF+1, %eax behaves as expected, even if it is probably never generated by any compiler. I did not check the behaviour for all relocation types

[Bug ld/19612] New: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19612 Bug ID: 19612 Summary: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `_Tvs19_emptyStringStorageVs6UInt32' can not be used when making a shared object Product: binutil

[Bug gold/19611] New: [ARM] fix_exidx_coverage may generate wrong unwind info.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19611 Bug ID: 19611 Summary: [ARM] fix_exidx_coverage may generate wrong unwind info. Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/19609] New: Load weak undefined symbol isn't optimized

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19609 Bug ID: 19609 Summary: Load weak undefined symbol isn't optimized Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 --- Comment #2 from louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > What are > > movl$E@GOT, %eax > movl$E@GOT+1, %eax > > used for? For the fun! You may prefer to do

[Bug binutils/15157] readelf crash (relocation handling)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15157 --- Comment #4 from cereza28 at icloud dot com --- Enviado desde mi iPhone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.