[Bug ld/19662] New: elf_link_sort_relocs is insufficient

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19662 Bug ID: 19662 Summary: elf_link_sort_relocs is insufficient Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug binutils/19661] [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug binutils/19660] [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug binutils/19659] [libopcodes] Segmentation fault on print_insn_i386

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19659 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

Incorrect warning for AVX512 gathers

2016-02-18 Thread Steve Vormwald
On the current tip of binutils-2_26-branch, gas is emitting an incorrect warning 'Warning: index and destination registers should be distinct' when the two zmm registers are separated by 16. For exmaple, zmm19 and zmm3 in 'vgatherqpd (%rax,%zmm19,8), %zmm3 {%k1}'. This warning was added

[Bug admin/19657] CERTIFICATE

2016-02-18 Thread WPGBLASANTHA at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19657 WELIGAMA PALALLAPALLIYA GURUGE BUDDHIKA LASANTHA changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug binutils/19661] New: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL

2016-02-18 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 Bug ID: 19661 Summary: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug binutils/19660] New: [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly

2016-02-18 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 Bug ID: 19660 Summary: [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug admin/19657] CERTIFICATE

2016-02-18 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19657 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

2016-02-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c304e18e5ca825f57963bd0c5f022fa8f5797b29 commit

[Bug admin/19657] New: CERTIFICATE

2016-02-18 Thread WPGBLASANTHA at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19657 Bug ID: 19657 Summary: CERTIFICATE Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee:

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19617] ELF: Allow -E to work without -pic/-pie/-shared in the absence of undefined symbols

2016-02-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19617 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bf89386a862ace008f0152bca8bddf996d3993c8 commit

Re: OCTETS_PER_BYTE and Gas

2016-02-18 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Dan, > The assembler support structure provided by the GNU assembler has worked > quite well for this circumstance, with only a couple minor changes that > I would like to propose. Thanks for sending us this patch. I have decided to apply the changes to the alignment functions, but not