[Bug binutils/19747] New: compile failure in rl78-dis.c

2016-02-29 Thread spam_hole at shaw dot ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19747 Bug ID: 19747 Summary: compile failure in rl78-dis.c Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-29 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- Ah, yes ld -r will get lots of orphans when linking -ffunction-sections objects, and my pr19162 fix is quite expensive. Patch approved, but please move the comment down to just before "place = NULL" rather

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9) > Why is place_orphan being called? ie. What section is missing from the > linker script? It is called on .text.* sections. We don't want to fold all .text.* sections

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-29 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 f

[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression

2016-02-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 9054 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9054&action=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/19162] Huge binary after linking sections with "a" and "wa" flags

2016-02-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19162 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7f50ebc1b1215520b85cb9a8e709e502898fd2c8 commit 7f50ebc1b1215520b85cb9a8e709e502

[Bug gas/19744] New: Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets

2016-02-29 Thread cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744 Bug ID: 19744 Summary: Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

Problems in as.1

2016-02-29 Thread esr
This is automatically generated email about markup problems in a man page for which you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, please tell me so I can correct my database. See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/bugs.html for details on how and why these patches were genera