[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9098|sectionheaders.2.15.1.txt |sectionheaders.2.25.1.txt f

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9099|sectionheaders.2.16.txt |sectionheaders.2.26.txt fil

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- Please attach the complete stdout and stderr from running gcc with "-v --save-temps -Wl,--no-demangle". Look through that output for lines that say "[Leaving ...]", and tar up all the .ltrans.s files mentio

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 --- Comment #24 from Fabian Vogt --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23) > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #20) > > Hum, so we leave 2.26 broken? > > Please try users/hjl/pr19827/binutils-2_26-branch branch. Tested and boots.

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9100|privateheaders.2.15.1.txt |privateheaders.2.25.1.txt f

[Bug ld/17334] building gcc-4.5.4 hits BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.25 assertion fail elf32-bfin.c:4457

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9101|privateheaders.2.16.txt |privateheaders.2.26.txt fil

[Bug ld/19827] Wrong relocation with defined symbol in PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fi

[Bug ld/19803] gc-sections breaks PE DLL variable export

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 --- Comment #13 from martin.koegler at chello dot at --- Created attachment 9108 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9108&action=edit Cleaned patch I'm currently testings this on a tree without 41f46ed9fea1a066de95b6a85c563

[Bug ld/17334] building gcc-4.5.4 hits BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.25 assertion fail elf32-bfin.c:4457

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #8 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, it still happens with gcc/binutils git from today: /bin/bash /home/wbx/bfin/toolchain_build_sim-bfin_uclibc-ng_bf512/w-gcc-git-1/gcc-git/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs . /home/wbx/bfin/toolchain

[Bug ld/19803] gc-sections breaks PE DLL variable export

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Nick Clif

[Bug ld/19803] gc-sections breaks PE DLL variable export

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 --- Comment #6 from martin.koegler at chello dot at --- The last patch is incorrect. In my testcase, it still exports the removed variable in the DLL export table: [Ordinal/Name Pointer] Table [ 0] testval So directly linking with th

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9103|syms.2.16.txt |syms.2.26.txt filename|

[Bug ld/19827] Wrong relocation with defined symbol in PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fvogt at suse dot com -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #20) > Hum, so we leave 2.26 broken? Please try users/hjl/pr19827/binutils-2_26-branch branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug binutils/19323] [FG-VD-15-113] BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- No, sorry. Advertising doesn't go in ChangeLogs. If you submitted a patch on the mailing list for a problem, then you could say how the problem was discovered. Many more people read the mailing list than l

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 Bug 19807 depends on bug 19827, which changed state. Bug 19827 Summary: Wrong relocation with defined symbol in PIE https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19827 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug ld/19480] [2.26.51 regression] ld creates wrong output for libstdc++6.dll for mingw32 (32-bit)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480 --- Comment #6 from Stephen Kitt --- Hi Nick, > First of all, please try out the patch that I am about to upload. It may be > that the problem is that the linker is garbage collecting sections that are > really needed, because the linker scr

[Bug ld/19480] [2.26.51 regression] ld creates wrong output for libstdc++6.dll for mingw32 (32-bit)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480 --- Comment #7 from Stephen Kitt --- Created attachment 9110 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9110&action=edit Build log for libstdc++-v3 with ld 2.25.90.20151209 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug ld/19480] [2.26.51 regression] ld creates wrong output for libstdc++6.dll for mingw32 (32-bit)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480 --- Comment #8 from Stephen Kitt --- Created attachment 9111 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9111&action=edit Build log for libstdc++-v3 with ld 2.26 and Nick's patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9102|syms.2.15.1.txt |syms.2.25.1.txt filename|

[Bug ld/18452] ld allows overlapping sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452 --- Comment #2 from Matt Grochowalski --- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;h=ec457111c02dd5a5e29ce7ce30e95a17ef470c78 The linker previously detected section conflicts involving the .bss section, but this commit in 2009 chan

[Bug ld/19795] LD crash on mipsel aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c:909 in _bfd_merged_section_offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19795 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/19849] Solaris 11 as generated object incompatible with 2.26 objcopy "no group info for section" during GCC 5.3.0 gccgo build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19849 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #12) > Hi Rainer, > Would you mind trying out patch VII in PR 19803 and see if that makes a > difference ? > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803

[Bug ld/19827] Wrong relocation with defined symbol in PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Problems in as.1

Hi Eric, > Problems with as.1: > > Your Synopsis is exceptionally creative. Unfortunately, that means > it cannot be translated to structural markup even when things like > running-text inclusions have been moved elswhere. > > This page was generated from some sort of non-man markup. Please >

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #3 from Matt Godbolt --- Hi Cary, The output of even the compiled files is somewhat sensitive. Would it be possible to email them directly to you instead of placing them here? Also; the process you described left some .o files as

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9089|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/19827] Wrong relocation with defined symbol in PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fi

[Bug ld/19803] gc-sections breaks PE DLL variable export

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 --- Comment #9 from martin.koegler at chello dot at --- I have reworked the first version a little bit. The DEF-handling looks OK. SEH prevents the removal of a function, Get dx.s from Comment #2. t1.s: = .file "t1.c"

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=45821bef0977a7436aa5cd5f37f5a178d446d675 commit 45821bef0977a7436aa5cd5f37

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19842] LTO build fails to write call address for weak symbol reference

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- > Please attach the complete stdout and stderr from running gcc with "-v > --save-temps -Wl,--no-demangle". Look through that output for lines > that say "[Leaving ...]", and tar up all the .ltrans.s files

[Bug ld/18452] ld allows overlapping sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- See https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-05/msg00330.html for why lang_check_section_addresses can't check bss. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/18452] ld allows overlapping sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452 Matt Grochowalski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||MatthewS.Grochowalski at ge dot c

[Bug ld/19531] ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/19721] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Incorrect aliasing for ORR instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8678914fcb40e4c620a33e6b38a14df928fa780a commit 8678914fcb40e4c620a33e6b38a