[Bug binutils/20100] New: make distclean should not try to remove libiberty/testsuite dir

2016-05-15 Thread sourceforge.brock at dse dot nl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20100 Bug ID: 20100 Summary: make distclean should not try to remove libiberty/testsuite dir Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/20099] binutils: Obscure `ld' error on 32-bit Ubuntu "_moddi3: .... error adding symbols: Bad value"

2016-05-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20099 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug ld/20093] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against symbol `foo1' defined in LARGE_COMMON section

2016-05-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=823a9c16b36df994998b6cace24469bcf84d6030 commit 823a9c16b36df99499

[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations

2016-05-15 Thread lenohou at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 --- Comment #15 from Leno Hou --- Hi Alan Modra, When used your patch, below is not we expected. localhost files # ld -V GNU ld (Gentoo 2.25.1 p1.1) 2.25.1

[Bug ld/20099] binutils: Obscure `ld' error on 32-bit Ubuntu "_moddi3: .... error adding symbols: Bad value"

2016-05-15 Thread matthew at giassa dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20099 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Giassa --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Please try binutils-2_26-branch. Good day H.J. Lu, Is there a wiki or FAQ you could point me towards for building and deploying a test/local build of `binutils' a

[Bug ld/20099] binutils: Obscure `ld' error on 32-bit Ubuntu "_moddi3: .... error adding symbols: Bad value"

2016-05-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20099 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthew Giassa from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > Please try binutils-2_26-branch. > > Good day H.J. Lu, > > Is there a wiki or FAQ you could point me towards for buildin

[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations

2016-05-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 --- Comment #16 from Alan Modra --- I am far from omniscient, so no, I can't tell you what you or Gentoo did. The patch that I committed to binutils master on top of Nick's patch merely fixed use of += in shell scripts, a feature not supporte

[Bug binutils/20089] stripe-new crashed because of a Access Violation Fault.

2016-05-15 Thread ecular at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089 Ecular Xu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|objcopy.c line 1130 has not |stripe-new crashed because

[Bug binutils/20089] stripe-new crashed because of an Access Violation Fault.

2016-05-15 Thread ecular at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089 Ecular Xu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|stripe-new crashed because |stripe-new crashed because