[Bug ld/20815] throw errors for invalid load segment

2016-11-16 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815 --- Comment #9 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8) Hi Nick, Thank you for the explanation.It cost you much time I guess :). It seems that whether the elf is valid become the most important

[Bug ld/20832] String merging elf32-i386 object files with elf64-x86-64 ld causes incorrect results

2016-11-16 Thread Jonathon.Reinhart at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20832 Jonathon.Reinhart at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug ld/20832] New: String merging elf32-i386 object files with elf64-x86-64 ld causes incorrect results

2016-11-16 Thread Jonathon.Reinhart at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20832 Bug ID: 20832 Summary: String merging elf32-i386 object files with elf64-x86-64 ld causes incorrect results Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/20830] .plt.got section is lacking unwind info

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Created attachment 9640 [details] > A patch > > Please try this. This patch isn't necessary unless it shows a difference in run-time behavior. -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/20830] .plt.got section is lacking unwind info

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 9640 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9640=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/20830] .plt.got section is lacking unwind info

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/20830] New: .plt.got section is lacking unwind info

2016-11-16 Thread keno at juliacomputing dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830 Bug ID: 20830 Summary: .plt.got section is lacking unwind info Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gold/20805] gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug binutils/20814] DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (IDATA6 Section)

2016-11-16 Thread jacky.chouchou at yandex dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20814 --- Comment #6 from Rudy --- Hopely, with this, mingw generate def file with @ordinal in it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20814] DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (IDATA6 Section)

2016-11-16 Thread jacky.chouchou at yandex dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20814 --- Comment #5 from Rudy --- Created attachment 9639 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9639=edit An image comparing msvcr100.dll export table and gendef.exe import table with new dlltool. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/20814] DLLTool Put Wrong Hint Value In Lib Archieve (IDATA6 Section)

2016-11-16 Thread jacky.chouchou at yandex dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20814 --- Comment #4 from Rudy --- Created attachment 9638 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9638=edit msvcr100.def and objdump for libmsvcr100.a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/20815] throw errors for invalid load segment

2016-11-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ma, (In reply to ma.jiang from comment #6) > First of all , The elf specification does not say very clear about the > first load segment. In my edition > "Tool Interface Standard (TIS) > Executable

[Bug ld/20828] [MIPS] produces invalid dynamic symbol table when --gc-sections is used since PR ld/13177 fix

2016-11-16 Thread ma...@linux-mips.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ld/20828] New: [MIPS] produces invalid dynamic symbol table when --gc-sections is used since PR ld/13177 fix

2016-11-16 Thread james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828 Bug ID: 20828 Summary: [MIPS] produces invalid dynamic symbol table when --gc-sections is used since PR ld/13177 fix Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status:

[Bug ld/20815] throw errors for invalid load segment

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug gold/20805] gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold

2016-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > CCing H.J. for the wrong ld.bfd optimization. > > H.J.: on the attached testcase function > _ZN6__tsan10InitializeEPNS_11ThreadStateE > from tsan_rtl.o which

[Bug gas/20827] [2.28 Regression] gas: Assertion failure in encode_arm_shift at ../../gas/config/tc-arm.c:7438

2016-11-16 Thread renlin.li at arm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20827 --- Comment #2 from Renlin Li --- I can reproduce it. I am working on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list

[Bug gas/20827] [2.28 Regression] gas: Assertion failure in encode_arm_shift at ../../gas/config/tc-arm.c:7438

2016-11-16 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20827 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- $ cat t.S addr5, r4, lsl r0 $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c t.S t.S: Assembler messages: t.S:1: Error: bad instruction `addr5, r4,lsl r0' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug gas/20827] New: [2.28 Regression] gas: Assertion failure in encode_arm_shift at ../../gas/config/tc-arm.c:7438

2016-11-16 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20827 Bug ID: 20827 Summary: [2.28 Regression] gas: Assertion failure in encode_arm_shift at ../../gas/config/tc-arm.c:7438 Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status:

[Bug gas/20827] [2.28 Regression] gas: Assertion failure in encode_arm_shift at ../../gas/config/tc-arm.c:7438

2016-11-16 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20827 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf

[Bug ld/20688] [2.27 Regression] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!

2016-11-16 Thread CoreyMutter at eaton dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20688 Corey Mutter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||CoreyMutter at eaton dot com ---

[Bug ld/20815] throw errors for invalid load segment

2016-11-16 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815 --- Comment #6 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- Hi Nick, Thanks for the reply. This is a tricky problem. First of all , The elf specification does not say very clear about the first load segment. In my edition "Tool Interface

[Bug ld/20789] [avr] Relaxation does not correctly adjust DIFF reloc with negative value

2016-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20789 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Senthil Kumar Selvaraj : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4cb771f214ed6a2102e37bce255c6be5d0642f3a

[Bug ld/20824] enable warn-shared-textrel by default

2016-11-16 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20824 --- Comment #2 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- (In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #1) > patches should be sent to the binut...@sourceware.org mailing list for > discussion. there are problems with this particular patch, but that can

[Bug ld/20815] throw errors for invalid load segment

2016-11-16 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ma, Thanks for the unpacked files. With those I was able to reproduce the problem, although I am not at all sure yet that it actually represents a problem in the linker. First of all, you state