[Bug gas/22553] .largecomm, .lbss, .ldata, and .lrodata are still not documented after many, many years

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553 --- Comment #7 from john at buu dot ac.th --- Nick Clifton, Thank you. I am sorry I mixed in the section names with the directives. I suspect the section name thing uses unwritten or perhaps Red Hat in-house non-public rules, and I just

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cf9e7f1f07efa2ce6846d8a29015dd8fb70197b0 commit

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d346bb277c7f194ece73a7200d1ed6417b1194e5 commit

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2888249fc9eb38b6d6e4bd969ce63c26e3753d5e commit

[Bug ld/22393] Add read-only segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=47acac12c83f173481debc64618626b50ecf7498 commit

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #18 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, A link to all files is okay? https://debug.openadk.org/bfin/ best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/22677] ld -r --gc-section does not KEEP .init_array/.fini_array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 --- Comment #7 from David Leonard --- > Please could you try it out and let me know if it works for you. Confirmed. My tests pass without workaround. I used current master ld (89a7f793f1). Thanks! --

[Bug ld/22649] -gc-sections preserves hidden symbols that are also visible in dynamic objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22649 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d664fd41e15f058aab41b70c567ad09f2fab1115 commit

[Bug ld/22649] -gc-sections preserves hidden symbols that are also visible in dynamic objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22649 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22677] ld -r --gc-section does not KEEP .init_array/.fini_array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unspecified

[Bug ld/22677] ld -r --gc-section does not KEEP .init_array/.fini_array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8b6f4cd34fdde524ea035c65f7d48aaa3fb449b5 commit

[Bug ld/22677] ld -r --gc-section does not KEEP .init_array/.fini_array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 10728 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10728=edit Proposed patch Hi David, Sorry - I missed the "-r" option in your initial bug report. This does pose an

readelf: displaying dynamic section of a 64-bit ELF

Hello, I just discovered a display issue in readelf, which affects only 64-bit ELFs. I was about to check info in the dynamic section, and I saw the header line is a bit off. In the source code I found the answer: it was hard-coded for 32-bit ELFs. So here is my patch -- perhaps not perfect,

[Bug ld/22696] Wrong order of SHLIB_RODATA_ADDR in elf.sc?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22696 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22696] Wrong order of SHLIB_RODATA_ADDR in elf.sc?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22696 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6bd0a312a4cb6803b9d6aa2f5646b610d213a1fe commit

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Possibly something to do with your build environment for powerpc64le. Check whether collect2 is being run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- hmm, I'm wondering why I only see that with binutils trunk on powerpc64le... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___