[Bug admin/22799] Contact 1(844) 601-4333 Amazon Echo Customer Service Phone Number^&*

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug admin/22806] Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug admin/22805] Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug admin/22804] Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug admin/22803] setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８ amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number!

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug admin/22805] New: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805 Bug ID: 22805 Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number{{BhabhiJi}} Product:

[Bug admin/22806] New: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806 Bug ID: 22806 Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number{{BhabhiJi}} Product:

[Bug admin/22804] New: Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804 Bug ID: 22804 Summary: Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug admin/22803] New: setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８ amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number!

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803 Bug ID: 22803 Summary: setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number! Product: binutils Version: unspecified

[Bug binutils/22802] New: massive performance regression for `readelf -n`

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22802 Bug ID: 22802 Summary: massive performance regression for `readelf -n` Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug admin/22799] New: Contact 1(844) 601-4333 Amazon Echo Customer Service Phone Number^&*

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799 Bug ID: 22799 Summary: Contact 1(844) 601-4333 Amazon Echo Customer Service Phone Number^&* Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #13) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat > > PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32

[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 --- Comment #13 from Cary Coutant --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat > PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocation. I posted a patch for ld: > >

[Bug ld/22706] bfd/elf32-sh.c fails asserts without additional information: sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD assertion fail bfd/elf32-sh.c:5171

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/22710] Signed Integer Overflow (71889280)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22710 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/22712] Stack Overflow (71959517)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22712 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 --- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c20c30f615756ddfccc4bb75c65ccfc1a399466e

[Bug binutils/22789] addr2line can't determine function names in mips binaries compiled with -gline-tables-only

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/22788] AddressSanitizer: SEGV /home/ubuntu/binutils/binutils_git/binutils-gdb/bfd/libbfd.c:558 bfd_getl32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22788 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/22789] addr2line can't determine function names in mips binaries compiled with -gline-tables-only

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=46d09186d340407fdcf066fea25444682e989512 commit

[Bug binutils/22793] Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/22793] Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68807c3cd64ccc4f0e9261df3e840d30d9a19b51 commit

[Bug binutils/22771] nm does not display line information for uninlined copies of functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22771 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/22794] Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/22794] Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=64e234d417d5685a4aec0edc618114d9991c031b commit

[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #12

Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)

On version 2.30.51.20180206 and master branch of binutils: there is a reachable assertion in the find_section function of (src/binutils/readelf.c), which could be triggered by the following POC. The assertion statement is: 653 static Elf_Internal_Shdr * 654 find_section (Filedata *

[Bug binutils/22794] New: Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794 Bug ID: 22794 Summary: Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c) Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/22793] New: Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793 Bug ID: 22793 Summary: Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c) Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal