[Bug ld/22920] Segfault in ld with RISC-V binary target

2018-03-05 Thread geoffrey at allott dot email
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22920 --- Comment #2 from Geoffrey Allott --- Hi Jim, thanks for responding. Objcopy was indeed the way I ended up doing it - since it's a relatively simple workaround it makes sense that this is low priority, though an error message would have been

[Bug ld/22920] Segfault in ld with RISC-V binary target

2018-03-05 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22920 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/22923] readelf crashes with fuzzed samples 748 times

2018-03-05 Thread calc.develop at web dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22923 --- Comment #9 from calc.develop at web dot de --- (In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #8) > Can you test whether this patch: > > $ git diff binutils/readelf.c > diff --git a/binutils/readelf.c b/binutils/readelf.c > index e3af50a9c9..b8

[Bug gold/22868] Gold does not select proper symbol visibility when used with LLVM gold-plugin

2018-03-05 Thread matz at suse dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug binutils/22923] readelf crashes with fuzzed samples 748 times

2018-03-05 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22923 --- Comment #8 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- Can you test whether this patch: $ git diff binutils/readelf.c diff --git a/binutils/readelf.c b/binutils/readelf.c index e3af50a9c9..b85db9f97c 100644 --- a/binutils/readelf.c +++ b/binutils/readelf.c

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

2018-03-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

2018-03-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e70b27ba900581df8e23cbbd4612176f869d796 commit 0e70b27ba900581df8e23cbbd4612176

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

2018-03-05 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > A patch is posted at > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-03/msg00015.html Thanks. With that patch my original testcase takes just 11 seconds (from 2 minute