[Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes

2020-08-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #2) > There is this function som_bfd_copy_private_section_data() which is never > called but it looks like it should be called when objcopy is run. But it *is* call

[Bug binutils/26356] FAIL: objcopy --reverse-bytes

2020-08-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- There is this function som_bfd_copy_private_section_data() which is never called but it looks like it should be called when objcopy is run. This is the reason container is NULL in the output section.

Issue 23942 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf

2020-08-10 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 23942 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=23942#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot

[Bug gas/26339] [aarch64] unknown architectural extensions

2020-08-10 Thread ndesaulniers at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26339 --- Comment #7 from Nick Desaulniers --- (LLVM patch for memtag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85620). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/21351] documentation for --relax

2020-08-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21351 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ccd9fae5d57b9a16d00d70d9dad916133ff1ea70 commit ccd9fae5d57b9a16d00d70d9dad

[Bug ld/21351] documentation for --relax

2020-08-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21351 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/26357] Building binutils with plugins enabled breaks ar/ranlib symbol table on 32-bit HP-UX

2020-08-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26357 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 12759 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12759&action=edit Patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26028] Readelf truncates symbol names - which is both undocumented, and unnecessary

2020-08-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26028 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #8) > I think this essentially means that users have to specify -W if they want to > get some information from the output... In my opinion though, this would be a goo

[Bug binutils/26302] nm -D -u now by default displays symbol versions, adding --with-symbol-versions duplicates them

2020-08-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26302 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9b0ac51b22d0cf900f39e17e615bb22e32720f6e commit 9b0ac51b22d0cf900f39e17e615bb22e

[Bug gas/26339] [aarch64] unknown architectural extensions

2020-08-10 Thread david.spickett at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26339 --- Comment #6 from David Spickett --- > Is the tlbi instruction what was added in ARMv8.4 (tlb-rmi), or only certain > operands? (I'm reading this from the ARMARM for v8, "C6.2.328 TLBI") tlbi is a sys instruction alias which I think means