https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27254
Bug ID: 27254
Summary: Wrong operand for SADDR (rl78)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945
Salvatore Bonaccorso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||CVE-2021-20197
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27252
Eli Zaretskii changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13161|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #7 from Nick Alcock ---
OK, I'll work on upstreaming it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27252
Bug ID: 27252
Summary: nm doesn't recognize null device on MS-Windows
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: binu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4356
Eli Zaretskii changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1730|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4356
Eli Zaretskii changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eliz at gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #6 from Joel ---
The provided patch worked. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27243
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27243
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0db21b8a2b97605206a034619ff6be5410b4cdb3
commit 0db21b8a2b97605206
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27243
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1f583bc2fcb1b5c4125faf8b8e815255b2b21b62
commit 1f583bc2fcb1b5c4125faf8b8e815255
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #5 from Joel ---
> Should have a fix for you to test in a few minutes.
Thank you for this - I will try the patch and report results.
Fortunately, my rule whenever updating fundamental programs is to do a full
backup before-hand,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #4 from Nick Alcock ---
Created attachment 13159
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13159&action=edit
Fix ld-versus-libctf installation ordering
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #3 from Nick Alcock ---
Ohhh I bet I know what it is. You'll need to roll back by sticking the old ld
in place (I hope you have a copy) or roll forward by hand-copying
.libs/libctf.so.0 into place in /usr/local.
The problem is ins
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
You are overwriting the ld program in your PATH, which was also configured to
use for building.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nick.alcock at oracle dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27246
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--
You are rec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27250
Bug ID: 27250
Summary: Installation of 2.36 fails with 'LIBCTF_1.1 not found'
followed by 'relink' suggestion
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_35-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a2aa107b13785088fe417163b4f21e481e9f8130
commit a2aa107b13785088fe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_35-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=74c2eff55954b850b8bc9804cbf4e599919a811a
commit 74c2eff55954b850b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27243
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #3)
> I'd independently tracked down GCC PR 97683 to this conflict between
> --gdwarf-5 and relaxation, but I'm not sure the patch is the right fix. I
> need to poke at it a bit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
Also fixed on 2.35 branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27226
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c9c9b9b55520b36c15af94ee0803f0922b3ca09
commit 1c9c9b9b55520b36c15af94ee0803
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27246
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liska ---
Or there's an assembly snippet:
$ cat a-gets-chk.s
.file 1 "gets-chk.i"
.cfi_startproc
.cfi_endproc
.section.debug_info,"",@progbits
.quad .Ltext0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27246
Bug ID: 27246
Summary: ld.gold does not support DWARF5
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
26 matches
Mail list logo
