[Bug binutils/28672] Link failure on some targets when building as PIE

2022-01-25 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/28816] ../include/elf/common.h:1409:0: error: "AT_SUN_HWCAP" redefined [-Werror]

2022-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28816 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b6437be6879672d2e0da2c8c7e742f126457b9df commit

[Bug ld/28816] ../include/elf/common.h:1409:0: error: "AT_SUN_HWCAP" redefined [-Werror]

2022-01-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28816 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/28816] ../include/elf/common.h:1409:0: error: "AT_SUN_HWCAP" redefined [-Werror]

2022-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28816 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b60d9d90ce6e16d8d1c93e3b16648066dfc4c58b commit

[Bug binutils/28818] objdump: disassembling raw binaries for x86-64 truncates addresses

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28818 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Ivan G from comment #4) > I see. Thanks, it's hard to find documentation on this. Maybe it would be > nice if it somehow reported the inconsistency between two parameters. -m i386 should give you

[Bug binutils/28818] objdump: disassembling raw binaries for x86-64 truncates addresses

2022-01-25 Thread nekotekina at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28818 --- Comment #4 from Ivan G --- I see. Thanks, it's hard to find documentation on this. Maybe it would be nice if it somehow reported the inconsistency between two parameters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug binutils/28818] objdump: disassembling raw binaries for x86-64 truncates addresses

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28818 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug binutils/28818] objdump: disassembling raw binaries for x86-64 truncates addresses

2022-01-25 Thread nekotekina at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28818 --- Comment #2 from Ivan G --- Created attachment 13928 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13928=edit Raw binary file with x86-64 machine code I believe it can be reproduced with any random data though. -- You are

[Bug ld/28819] [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You

[Bug ld/28819] [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.38 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug binutils/28818] objdump: disassembling raw binaries for x86-64 truncates addresses

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28818 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ld/28819] [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO

2022-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 13927 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13927=edit A patch Try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/28819] [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO

2022-01-25 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/28819] New: [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO

2022-01-25 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819 Bug ID: 28819 Summary: [2.38 Regression] ld between Jan 06 and Jan 21 builds binaries without RELRO Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: NEW Severity: