https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #12 from Evangelos Foutras ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> A patch is posted at
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-February/119740.html
Works great, thanks! :)
(Gave it a quick test by rebuilding
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-February/119740.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #4 on issue 40967 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_addr2line:
Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl16
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40967#c4
This bug has exceeded our disclosure
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #4 on issue 40993 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe:
Null-dereference READ in mips_gprel_reloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40993#c4
This bug has exceeded our
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 40987 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe:
Direct-leak in xrealloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40987#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #4 on issue 40970 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Crash in
filter_symbols
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40970#c4
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=caa6172de4b5100c9b45fd03eae714167a6085c1
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ebb191adac4ab45498dec0bfaac62f0a33537ba4
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
freswa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freswa at archlinux dot org
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882
Bug ID: 28882
Summary: build failure in readelf.c with gcc-4.2 due to use of
0b literals
Product: binutils
Version: 2.38
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #9 from Evangelos Foutras ---
Created attachment 13973
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13973=edit
Build log from the source build of libheif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> Created attachment 13971 [details]
> The v2 patch
>
> I got
>
> /usr/gcc-12.0.1-x32/bin/gcc -B./ -o x main.o libfoo.so -Wl,-R,.
> ./ld: main.o: non-canonical
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #8 from Evangelos Foutras ---
Created attachment 13972
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13972=edit
Reproducer with source build
Sorry this took a while, I tried to make it use the bundled x265 library which
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #6)
>
> However, I can provide a repro.sh that builds libheif from source and
> reproduces the undefined references on GCC 11.2 + binutils 2.38; would that
> help?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #6 from Evangelos Foutras ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> It may be a GCC 11.1 bug.
Are you referring to the error about _ZTI11QSharedData@Qt_5 in my last comment,
or the original issue? The system libQt5Gui was
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #4 from Evangelos Foutras ---
Thank you for looking into this. :)
I applied your diff on top of binutils 2.38 and was able to successfully build
libheif and nextcloud-client with it. Previously, these two Arch Linux packages
(and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
I am testing this:
diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c
index 6fa18d92007..a231bdabd28 100644
--- a/bfd/elflink.c
+++ b/bfd/elflink.c
@@ -1295,7 +1295,9 @@ _bfd_elf_merge_symbol (bfd *abfd,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28264
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||28879
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Blocks|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hudson at canonical
dot co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
that patch is
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/blob/sid/debian/patches/arm/local-vfp-sysdeps.diff
Michael just confirmed that fpc still fails to build without this patch (and
builds with the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
Allan McRae changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allan at archlinux dot org
--
You are
26 matches
Mail list logo
