https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> Created attachment 14602 [details]
> Try this one
This looks to have worked! The failures for binutils-try-debian-i386 /
binutils-try-fedora-arm64 /
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> Created attachment 14602 [details]
> Try this one
Note that since the gentoo-sparc builder also does binutils-try builds you can
try by pushing to a branch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14601|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> Thanks H.J., this works!
>
> === ld Summary ===
> # of expected passes 1598
> # of expected failures26
> # of untested
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Thanks H.J., this works!
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes1598
# of expected failures 26
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 157
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #9)
> The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard
> :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 14601
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14601=edit
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is unrelated to -z unique-symbol. I got
$ cc -B/home/hjlu/build/build-sparc64-linux/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-L=/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64 -L=/usr/local/lib64 -L=/lib64
-L=/usr/lib64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64
> > machine on GCC compiler farm was down.
>
> I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64
> machine on GCC compiler farm was down.
I can give you access to this environment if you
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #29)
> Created attachment 14590 [details]
> Augmented^2 patch
LGTM. Please send it to the binutils mailing list. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391#c10
I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64
machine on GCC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993
--- Comment #7 from William Cohen ---
I rebuilt the binutils-2.39-8.fc38.src.rpm on the f36 machine that I originally
discover merge_gnu_build_note taking a large fraction of the rpmbuild install
and installed the resulting binutils rpms.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |vladimir.mezentsev at
oracle
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006
--- Comment #3 from Satadru Pramanik ---
Apologies. I have attached the entire build log from our build system.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006
--- Comment #2 from Satadru Pramanik ---
Created attachment 14599
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14599=edit
Build log for binutils 2.40 on i686
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #5)
Hi Frank,
Yes - I am afraid that the watermark protocol document is a bit out of date,
and its rules for note merging do need to be updated.
> So, as for a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5999477d92aecd9df5fb0b2f04c33b987a7db40c
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
You have stripped the actual error from the build log. Please also state how
you have configured the build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
21 matches
Mail list logo
