https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
--- Comment #3 from Stas Sergeev ---
You need to consider being compatible
with lld, which disagree with what you
say.
But that suggestion works for me, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
--- Comment #1 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #0)
> It would really help if you implement ASSERT()
> natively, but this is another story.
Except that ASSERT() is already there. :)
I made sure that with ASSERT() t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #17 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #16)
> Stas - if you can find a way to trigger the bug with these patches applied,
> please feel free to reopen this PR.
I tried to reproduce it again
(w/o any patch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fd00374fc73e990b2a1b97a1bab431e0466f5efc
commit fd00374fc73e990b2a1b97a1ba
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from Nick Cli
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #13 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12)
> The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;
> h=a79e9a07a0d350031cd491031a756
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a79e9a07a0d350031cd491031a756fbaa6a01df0
commit a79e9a07a0d350031cd491031a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1d45d90934b10862c00a22bcf4075815a785001b
commit 1d45d90934b10862c00a22bcf40
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #11 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10)
> The results of the tests that you said you were running in comment #7.
The results were absolutely positive.
The suggested work-around works as expected.
But
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #9)
> The status of this bug is "WAITING".
> Waiting for what?
The results of the tests that you said you were running in comment #7.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #9 from Stas Sergeev ---
The status of this bug is "WAITING".
Waiting for what?
I provided a test-case and it was
confirmed, so please update the status?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
Bug ID: 30974
Summary: DEFINED() always evaluates to 0
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
14 matches
Mail list logo
