[Bug gold/29678] Unsupported target for loongrach64-linux-gnu for linker

2022-11-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gold/29226] gcc -fcf-protection option causes GCC 12 gccgo build to fail : "failed to match split-stack sequence"

2022-06-07 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29226 --- Comment #18 from Cary Coutant --- I don't really see what CET has to do with split stack, so I would guess that, with CET enabled, the RDSSPD/Q instruction gets generated before the CMP or LEA instruction that we're expecting as the start

[Bug gold/17169] gold: many_sections_define.h test fails: argument list too long error

2022-02-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17169 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug gold/28871] gold: --no-define-common is incompatible with GNU ld

2022-02-08 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28871 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- I do not see how gold's --no-define-common is incompatible with ld's. According to the ld manual, and from looking at the original ld patch, they seem to do exactly the same thing, which is in fact the oppo

[Bug gold/27869] gold lto link corrupt with segmentation fault [signal 11]

2021-05-15 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27869 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- Based on that stack trace, you appear to be linking an output file that has more than 64K sections in it. Obviously, gold should not be crashing when that happens, but what on earth are you linking that has

[Bug gold/27815] gold fails to build with latest GCC

2021-05-05 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27815 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Cary Cout

[Bug gold/27303] gold/testsuite/initpri3. test fails on gold and lld, passes on bfd. Which one is correct?

2021-03-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ccoutant at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/27615] Gold prints trace (-t) output to stderr instead of stdout

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27615 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gold/27615] Gold prints trace (-t) output to stderr instead of stdout

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27615 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug gold/27615] New: Gold prints trace (-t) output to stderr instead of stdout

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: ccoutant at gmail dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Gnu ld prints trace (-t) output to stdout, but gold prints to stderr. The ld manual does not specify

[Bug gold/24479] aarch64 gold make check failure

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24479 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Cary Cout

[Bug gold/26219] support DWARF5 split dwarf in dwp

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26219 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/26039] gold doesn't add PIE flag

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26039 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/26541] gold makes incorrect usage of fallocate in fallback path

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/26585] gold: call to deprecated mallinfo raises -Werror=deprecated-declarations with latest glibc

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26585 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/27246] ld.gold does not support DWARF5

2021-03-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27246 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27587] BFD (and gold) DWARF reader choke on DWARF5 as generated by LTO

2021-03-18 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27587 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/27441] Small inconsistency in between gold and bfd

2021-03-08 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27441 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug gold/26678] construction vtable defined in a discarded section

2021-02-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #1) > The problem is that the inline asm is making GCC think that ~A::A() can > raise an exception, so it creates compensation code in D::D(), which > requires a const

[Bug gold/26678] construction vtable defined in a discarded section

2021-02-05 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26678 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/26913] internal error in value_from_output_section at ../binutils/binutils-2.27/gold/reloc.cc:1495

2021-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26913 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/27303] gold/testsuite/initpri3. test fails on gold and lld, passes on bfd. Which one is correct?

2021-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gold/27303] gold/testsuite/initpri3. test fails on gold and lld, passes on bfd. Which one is correct?

2021-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- Works for me with GCC 11 (1/31/21 snapshot). Please also throw in a -v option on your gcc command and attach the verbose output. I'd like to see what options your compiler is passing to the linker. -- Yo

[Bug gold/27303] gold/testsuite/initpri3. test fails on gold and lld, passes on bfd. Which one is correct?

2021-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/26762] -Wl,--as-needed removes strong symbols in favour of weak symbols

2020-12-18 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26762 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant --- This old thread might be relevant: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2018-June/103245.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

2020-12-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gold/23539] --incremental-update doesn't work with GNU properties

2020-12-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23539 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/25495] Docskart

2020-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/21066] icf folds template functions with different exception handling semantics

2019-06-07 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/24462] Gold linker does not handle symbol versioning properly

2019-04-17 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24462 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/22628] gold ignores version of --wrap symbols

2019-04-17 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22628 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olim at ucla dot edu --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug gold/23646] gold segfault when using --threads

2019-02-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 --- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant --- Can I trouble you to add -Wl,--debug=plugin and upload a tar of the resulting directory? You may need to run that without threads to get complete debug output, but that may help me reproduce it here. -- Y

[Bug gold/24191] Gold doesn't properly process relocations to deduplicated code

2019-02-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24191 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23870] gold does not resolve the address of main when main is in a shared library

2019-02-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23870 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23646] gold segfault when using --threads

2019-02-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gold/24083] Gold is slow parsing large section-ordering-file file.

2019-01-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24083 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant --- > I am attaching the ordering file. I just spoke with HHVM developers and they > say that they had fixed it, so there may be patch for this already. Ugh, every last line in that file is a wild card. I'm su

[Bug gold/24083] Gold is slow parsing large section-ordering-file file.

2019-01-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24083 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Cary Cout

[Bug gold/23594] error: 'mkdtemp' was not declared in this scope

2018-12-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23594 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23880] Gold can't handle .gnu.build.attributes section with relocations

2018-11-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23880 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- Please attach a copy of the crti.o file causing the problem. Why isn't the relocation preventing those sections from being discarded? Should it, or are you expecting the linker to somehow adjust the content

[Bug gold/23842] "dwp -e" doesn't consult DW_AT_comp_dir attributes

2018-10-29 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23842 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gold/23646] gold segfault when using --threads

2018-10-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- Sorry, I can't reproduce the crash. I had to add -fpic to the compile command in order to link without errors. Either way, gold did not segfault. I've tried with various values for --thread-count. Can you

[Bug gold/23812] Explicitly mentioned libraries by -lx are not in the DT_NEEDED list

2018-10-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23812 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant --- Well... You didn't get a "can't find" or "can't open" error message, and libBrokenLocale.{a,so} isn't listed in the -t output. That can mean one of two things that I can think of offhand: (1) The LTO plug

[Bug gold/23812] Explicitly mentioned libraries by -lx are not in the DT_NEEDED list

2018-10-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23812 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- > calling “gcc /src/glibc228/input-file.c -fuse-ld=gold -lc -lBrokenLocale > -lpthread -lcrypt -ldl -lgcc_s -lnsl -lutil -lnss_dns -lnss_compat -lmvec > -lresolv -lnss_db -lm -lnss_files -lrt -lnss_hesiod -

[Bug gold/23575] sad

2018-08-27 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23575 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23503] -Ttext= doesn't work right with GNU property

2018-08-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
y: normal > Priority: P2 > Component: gold > Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com > Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com > CC: ian at airs dot com > Target Milestone: --- > > [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gold-2]$ cat x.s >

[Bug gold/23455] gold: should the discarded version information warning exist?

2018-08-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/21066] icf folds template functions with different exception handling semantics

2018-08-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21066 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oremanj at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug gold/23482] Identical code folding can break C++ exception handling invariants

2018-08-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23482 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-07-25 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 --- Comment #11 from Cary Coutant --- (In reply to Lan from comment #10) > Finally managed to get back to this issue. (I had reverted to use clang > 3.8, so needed to reinstall clang 6.0 to try to reproduce the problem.) > > After changing G

[Bug gold/23424] gold doesn't build on Darwin

2018-07-17 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23424 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- > It seems that using PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT can only be used in a static context, as > documented in the man page (https://linux.die.net/man/3/pthread_once). Since > it's POD, doing a deep copy with a staticall

[Bug gold/23411] Different behavior when linking common symbol statically or to shared object

2018-07-16 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23411 --- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant --- > BFD's behavior becomes very problematic with LTO: archive index does not > distinguish between normal and common definitions, and there's no explicit > plugin API to check if a definition in IR is "common

[Bug gold/23413] Builing gcc --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto\ bootstrap-O3 and gold fails

2018-07-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23413 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- Gold is not configured by default to search /usr/local/lib. To configure gold to search /usr/local/lib, use configure ... --with-lib-path=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib Or you can configure GCC to add "-

[Bug gold/23397] internal error in emit_relocs_scan gold/reloc.cc:518

2018-07-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23397 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23409] Shared libraries created with duplicate _end, _edata and __bss_start symbols

2018-07-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23409 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23411] Different behavior when linking common symbol statically or to shared object

2018-07-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23411 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug gold/23411] Different behavior when linking common symbol statically or to shared object

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23411 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 --- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant --- I was just using g++ as the linker driver, not to compile the objects. I linked with the objects you provided, which had been compiled by clang. Linking just those objects by themselves produces no warnings

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 --- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant --- I don't have clang installed, but when I use g++ instead, I get the following: GseAdEnableDB.o: In function `GseAdmTempFile(char*, char const*, char const*, GseError&)': /db2src/spatial/admin/GseAdEnableDB

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 --- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant --- Got it now -- sorry, problem on my end. On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:14 AM, lpham54321 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 > > --- Comment #4 from Lan --- > hmm

[Bug gold/22755] gold test suite failures (gentoo, 2.31)

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- Well, that didn't help -- nothing in config.log helps me reproduce these failures. I'll need some more of your help. Let's start with the first one; with luck, there's just one thing going on that's causin

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-07-13 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant --- I can't extract anything from the .tar file you provided -- tar tv and tar xv just hang indefinitely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug gold/22915] Gold doesn't support Intel CET

2018-06-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22915 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Cary Cout

[Bug gold/22914] Gold doesn't support .note.gnu.property section (NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0)

2018-06-22 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22914 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/23310] Support DWARF-5 line table features in assembler

2018-06-21 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23310 --- Comment #7 from Cary Coutant --- >> I can port the relevant parts >> over to trunk, and add the new .file directive. > > That would be much appreciated - thank you. > > Do you want me to delay the 2.31 branch for this ? I've still got a

[Bug gold/22914] Gold doesn't support .note.gnu.property section (NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0)

2018-06-21 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
;Summary: Gold doesn't support .note.gnu.property section > (NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0) >Product: binutils >Version: 2.31 (HEAD) > Status: NEW > Severity: enhancement > Priority: P2 >

[Bug gas/23310] Support DWARF-5 line table features in assembler

2018-06-21 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23310 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com

[Bug gold/23258] Linker cored dump at process_one_opcode

2018-06-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gold/23321] Gold Linker SIGSEGV During DWARF Decoding, because it doesn't support DW_LNS_set_epilogue_begin/end and DW_LNS_set_isa

2018-06-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23321 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- Can you provide a sample .o file? What compiler generated it? The "default" case in that switch statement should handle unknown opcodes correctly, unless the std_opcode_lengths array in the line table prolo

[Bug gold/23268] gold doesn't handle symbol versions like BFD ld when linking executable with both -E and --version-script

2018-06-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23268 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23268] gold doesn't handle symbol versions like BFD ld when linking executable with both -E and --version-script

2018-06-20 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23268 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.31 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug ld/23304] ARM linker fails to combine identical typeinfo sections

2018-06-18 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23304 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug gold/23295] Shared libraries cannot be searched for on some operating systems (e.g. OpenBSD)

2018-06-16 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295 --- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant --- You implied that you were going to change the linker, which is the wrong solution. The proper fix is to version your libraries correctly. Here's the Solaris documentation on the topic: https://docs.oracle

[Bug gold/23295] Shared libraries cannot be searched for on some operating systems (e.g. OpenBSD)

2018-06-16 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- (In reply to Brian Callahan from comment #3) > OpenBSD does not use symbolic links like this. There is never a symbolic > link libname.so pointing to a libname.so.X.Y. There is only a libname.X.Y. Well, th

[Bug gold/23295] Shared libraries cannot be searched for on some operating systems (e.g. OpenBSD)

2018-06-16 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23295 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23268] gold doesn't handle symbol versions like BFD ld when linking executable with both -E and --version-script

2018-06-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23268 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- You're using --version-script when linking an executable? As far as I know, that's not supported (and probably should be disallowed). Version scripts are for shared libraries. What happens if you remove th

[Bug gold/23016] assert in output.h on mix of .eh_frame types for x86_64

2018-05-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23016 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alec.theriault at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug gold/23155] internal error in set_info_section

2018-05-10 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Cary Cou

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steinar+binutils@gunderson.

[Bug gold/22820] ICF mismerges two very similar functions

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22820 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 --- Comment #14 from Cary Coutant --- > It boils down to reading a character 'c' off the string and then translating > it > through a lookup table to a UTF-16 code point: > > private static immutable dchar m_charMapStart = 0xa1; > pri

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
||2018-04-24 Assignee|tmsriram at google dot com |ccoutant at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #12 from Cary Coutant --- Here's a disassembly of the first part of the function in section 150: Disassembly of se

[Bug binutils/16504] gold: internal error in override_version, at resolve.cc:61 with -flto

2018-04-24 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16504 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe

2018-04-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/16504] gold: internal error in override_version, at resolve.cc:61 with -flto

2018-04-21 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ccoutant at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/23046] gold crashes while linking armv7hl binaries built with clang 6.0 when using --icf=safe

2018-04-19 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23046 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23046] gold crashes while linking armv7hl binaries built with clang 6.0 when using --icf=safe

2018-04-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23046 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23046] gold crashes while linking armv7hl binaries built with clang 6.0 when using --icf=safe

2018-04-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23046 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Cary Cout

[Bug gold/23046] gold crashes while linking armv7hl binaries built with clang 6.0

2018-04-14 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23046 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gold/22770] [MIPS] GOLD fails to link ghc: internal error in get_got_page_offset, at gold/mips.cc:6271

2018-04-05 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22770 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23016] assert in output.h on mix of .eh_frame types for x86_64

2018-04-04 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23016 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/21423] ./configure --enable-plugins

2018-03-28 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21423 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/22500] make -k check-gold errors in passing option

2018-03-28 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22500 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/22969] Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 relocation.

2018-03-28 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/22969] Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 relocation.

2018-03-27 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10918|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gold/22969] Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 relocation.

2018-03-27 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant --- Created attachment 10918 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10918&action=edit Patch to add support for new TLSLE relocs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug gold/22868] Gold does not select proper symbol visibility when used with LLVM gold-plugin

2018-03-26 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/22868] Gold does not select proper symbol visibility when used with LLVM gold-plugin

2018-03-23 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868 --- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant --- I've just committed a gold patch that adds a --debug=plugin option. This will create a temporary directory under your current working directory named "gold-record-X", and will store a log file and copie

[Bug gold/22883] Gold mis-evaluates R_X86_64_PLT32 reloc

2018-03-22 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883 --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- With a top-of-trunk assembler, I get the "- 4". $ cat test.s .globl bar .text foo: callq bar@PLT ret $ as -o test.o test.s $ readelf -rW test.o Relocation section '.rela.te

[Bug gold/22883] Gold mis-evaluates R_X86_64_PLT32 reloc

2018-03-22 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   4   5   >