https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
when building with 14, I get different issues:
/usr/bin/ld:
CMakeFiles/mir_unit_tests.dir/frontend_wayland/test_desktop_file_manager.cpp.o:
in function
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
the trunk (upcoming 2.43) fails to link an LTO enabled build, which succeeded
to link with 2.42. The failure is architecture independent
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Andreas.Krebbel at de dot
ibm.com
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seeing this on the 2.42 branch. did't see this building gcc-12 or gcc-13 cross
compilers, however a gcc-14
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
rebuilding did "fix" it. However you have to rebuild gdc-11 first (the last
gdc not requiring gdc to build) to build newer gdc versions. Is it worth
fixing this on older binutils branches?
--
You are
tatus: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15239
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15239=
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2 42 Regression] d21 (D|[2.42 Regression] d21 (D
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv64-linux-gnu
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
d21 (D frontend from GCC 13) fails to link with binutils trunk on
riscv64-linux-gnu, while
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
these are committed to GCC trunk, not yet to the gcc-13 branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
these are committed to GCC trunk, not yet to the gcc-13 branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
the combined build is using GCC 13.2.0 and binutils 2.41
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the combined build is using GCC 13.2.0 and binutils 2.41
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the current 2.41 branch, gprofng is not built and installed in a
combined binutils+gcc build, even if the combined build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the workaround is to copy the shared libsframe library to the destination
before calling the install target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libsframe
Assignee: indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
this is seen with the current 2.41 branch, a combined binutils+gcc build fails
to install (libbfd installed before
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31102
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.42 Regression] pr18841 |[2.42 Regression] Build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31102
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
trunk 20231125 fails tests on x86_64-linux-gnux32, succeeding with the 2.41
branch:
Test results, compared with installed binutils:
W
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31101
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||loongarch64-linux-gnu
--
You are
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
20231125 trunk, nopic link exec test fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu, succeeds
with the 2.41 branch:
Test results, compared
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv64-linux-gnu
--
You are
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20231125 on riscv64-linux-gnu. Succeeds with the 2.41 branch:
Test results, compared with installed binutils:
I: [gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
that patch fixes the issue for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
these are the current Debian and Ubuntu development versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm -D /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep pthread_create
00088580 T pthread_create@GLIBC_2.2.5
00088580 T pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm -D /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
w __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.2.5
A GLIBC_2.11
A GLIBC_2.12
A GLIBC_2.18
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
nm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: no symbols
glibc 2.37, there is no libpthread.so anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.41 branch:
gprofng(1) says:
The man pages for the various gprofng commands are not available yet,
but the --help option
supported on each of the commands
|remap-inputs causes build |introducing remap-inputs
|failure in edk2 |causes build failure in
||edk2
CC||doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30578
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30607
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk,
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
several regressions were introduced on the trunk between 20230611 and 20230622
for two mipsen targets, 30 on mipsel-linux-gnu and 106
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30602
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
independent of --enable-pgo-build=lto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30602
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-linux-gnu
CC|
: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
the gp-archive.exp hangs when run on i686-linux-gnu, top shows the a.out
process at 100%, not terminating.
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30447
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
I see these with and without --enable-pgo-build=lto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seeing a few regressions on the trunk, compared to 2.40, introduced between
20230501 and 20230510:
W: [binutils-all/objdump.exp] REGRESSION
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29940
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--
You
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20221101 on arm-linux-gnueabihf, these tests fail compared to
the 2.39 branch:
W: [ld-arm/arm-elf.exp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
--
You are
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.39 branch and the trunk,
the gprofng build writes the file gprofng/doc/version.texi into the srcdir
instead
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20221004 on riscv64-linux-gnu, succeeding with 2.39
Running /<>/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/riscv.exp ...
FAIL: gas
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
forwarded from https://bugs.debian.org/960686
That "gibberish" name is an internal name used in objcopy and it makes
more se
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen on a multiarch Linux system (Debian / Ubuntu):
https://bugs.debian.org/1016725
It looks like the *only* way to find the plugin directory is the configuration
file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
no, I also updated the compiler once.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen when linking python3.11 beta4 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. The link is a lto
link, together with -fprofile-generate
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Matthias
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
my last successful build was on 20220707, the only changes in the gprofng
subdir is the generated configure file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
building in a separate builddir, configuring with
../configure --with-sysroot=/ \
--libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu \
--disable-silent-rules --enable-obsolete
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.39 branch 20220713:
In file included from ../../../gprofng/src/../../include/demangle.h:32,
from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.29/2.30 Regression] |[2.39/2.40 Regression]
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
reported as https://bugs.debian.org/1014842
$ adequate "$pkg"
libgprofng0:amd64: undefined-symbol
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgprofng.so.0.0.0 => p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
a profiled lto GCC build:
- configure with -with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean
- build with: make profiledbootstrap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
it depends which *1 executable is built first.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/610456289/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-arm64.gcc-11_11.3.0-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
has failures in f951 and go1,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
caused by 90b7a5df152a64d2bea20beb438e8b81049a5c30 and
4fb55bf6a9606eb7b626c30a9f4e71d6c2d4fbb2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maskray at google dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
also reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/PR106145
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-linux-gnu
--
You are
Version: 2.39 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with binutils trunk 20220629 building GCC 10, 11, 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
trunk 20220527 still fails to build, this time with:
../../../gprofng/src/Experiment.cc: In member function ‘void
Experiment::write_header()’:
../../../gprofng/src/Experiment.cc:4139:33: error: cannot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29191
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
i.e. it ends up in /usr/etc, but should be /etc when configured with
--sysconfdir=/etc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
gprofng.rc is installed into
dbe_DATA = $(srcdir)/gprofng.rc
while it probably should be installed into the sysconfdir, which can be
specified
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20220512 on x86_64-linux-gnux32:
libtool: compile: x86_64-linux-gnux32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../gprofng/libcollector -
U_ASM -I.. -I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
no, everything on x86_64-linux-gnu so far, the i686 and aarch64 builds are
configured for these targets.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-inux-gnu
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
sorry, this is glibc 2.33, not 2.35.
$ echo __x86_64 | x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -E -
# 0 ""
# 0 ""
# 0 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 0 "" 2
# 1 ""
1
$ echo __x86_64 | x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -m32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-inux-gnu |i686-inux-gnu
|
: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, trunk 20220503:
libtool: link: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/synctrace.o
-Wl,--version-script -W
l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hudson at canonical
dot co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
that patch is
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/blob/sid/debian/patches/arm/local-vfp-sysdeps.diff
Michael just confirmed that fpc still fails to build without this patch (and
builds with the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, didn't find out yet why it's missing. Obviously it builds again with glibc
2.35 and the merged libc/libdl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at sourceware dot org
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the binutils 2.38 branch:
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnux32-ld: s-trasym.o: in function
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13947
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13947=edit
test case
seen when building a arm-li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28827
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
I'll check that
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28827
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.38 branch 20220126 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. last successful
build of LLVM 9 was with trunk 20220106.
[100
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.38 branch 20220123 and 20220126,
https://bugs.debian.org/1004269
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1958389
The Debian report contains
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
this works at least on i686 and s390x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28819
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
: critical
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
last known ld was 20220106, first known broken one 20220119.
ld builds binaries without RELRO on at least amd64, i386, ppc64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28751
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.38 Regression] mbind2a / |[2.38 Regression] mbind2a /
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28751
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.38 Regression] mbind2a / |[2.38 Regression] mbind2a /
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28751
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Compared to the 2.37 branch, the following tests fail with trunk 20220106:
W: [ld-elf/elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL):
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13668
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13668=edit
files for linking
[forwarded from ht
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25216
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
sure, removing the tests fixes the regressions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27358
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 13205
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13205=edit
log
these fail with:
Running: tmpdir/property-4 > tmpdir/property-4.out
tmpdir/property-4: CPU ISA level is
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
