)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5534
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone
)
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-31 19:26 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-12/msg00121.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-31 19:33 ---
It must be an HP-UX specific issue. I have no problems with --enable-shared
on Linux/Intel64.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-26 14:27 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-26 15:06 ---
This regression was introduced by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00158.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-27 01:12 ---
There are
/* An instruction to the linker to not output the section
even if it has information which would normally be written. */
#define SEC_NEVER_LOAD 0x200
`NOLOAD'
The section should be marked
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-27 01:26 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00150.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-25 22:37 ---
It works with binutils in CVS as of 2007-12-25:
./ld -m elf_i386 -o x -T bss.lds attention.o libbss.a
objdump -s -j .bs.server.name attention.o
attention.o: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-24 17:16 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-24 17:17 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-20 15:11 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00119.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5488
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-17 16:47 ---
Can you try the current binutils from CVS?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5492
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5494
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-17 16:50 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Maybe I broke the patch during backport to 2.18, but now 'strip' does not
break
a.out any more, but its size is reduced only slightly compared to 2.16.1:
original size: 68632
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-13 16:48 ---
Please provide outputs of readelf -Sl on a.out and a.out stripped by
strip-2.16.1.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-14 00:35 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00082.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 02:00 ---
Please provide the original executable so that I can reproduce it on Linux.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 01:57 ---
From gABI:
When the link editor searches archive libraries [see ``Archive File'' in Chapter
7], it extracts archive members that contain definitions of undefined global
symbols. The member's definition may be either
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||5453
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 01:49 ---
This is a dup of PR 5059.
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||5059
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-14 16:31 ---
2 patches are posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00145.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00158.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-13 20:18 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 14:12 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00115.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5307
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 14:37 ---
The updated patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00116.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5299
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 22:02 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 14:50 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5278 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 14:50 ---
*** Bug 5279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5278
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 17:02 ---
The problem is PE backed processes header data without checking if they
are valid. For example:
1476 fprintf (file,
1477%s\n, data + edt.name - adj);
in pe_print_edata. edt.name - adj is invalid
: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5307
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-10 15:53 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00100.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-09 13:21 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Can you verify that -fPIC or -mlarge-data is used:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2003-August/msg00039.html
Only -fPIC is in use. No -msmall-data
(HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-09 20:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=2083)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2083action=view)
This patch works for me.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-10 00:01 ---
One way to fix it is to provide both long and long long interfaces for
splay-tree with the old interface as default. Applications can choose which
one to use. We can skip the long long one if compiler doesn't support
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 14:33 ---
Can you verify that -fPIC or -mlarge-data is used:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2003-August/msg00039.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 04:51 ---
Can you try binutils 2.18?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 04:53 ---
Please provide testcases.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-04 16:02 ---
The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.3 is released with this patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg3.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5233
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-05 00:19 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
It still spots the same error:
*** failure in ../src/addr2line
loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable
*** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so
FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh
I think
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5233
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-30 18:54 ---
The bug was introduced by this patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00165.html
The linker check is correct. Otherwise, you will get a bogus binary
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-29 01:10 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com
http
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Priority|P2 |P1
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 06:56 ---
bash-3.2$ cat x.s
.text
movl(%rbx), %eax
1: ud2
.pushsection __bug_table,a
2: .quad 1b, .LC0
.word 136, 0
.org 2b+24
.popsection
.L21:
jmp .L21
bash
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 13:01 ---
For ELF, you can specify flags, type and others with
.section NAME [, FLAGS[, @TYPE[,FLAG_SPECIFIC_ARGUMENTS]]]
.subsection also should support them. The previous assembler did. The
previous manual had
7.81
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 17:28 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00364.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-23 13:28 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00308.html
Can you attach the patch here as well in a 'downloadable' format?
You can use raw text:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/get-raw
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-23 14:32 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Message spotted by elfutils is still the same of course:
loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable
*** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so
What is wrong with GNU_RELRO? It could
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 21:04 ---
I can't reproduce it:
./ld -Bstatic -T u-boot.lds -Ttext 0xfffc -n start.o resetvec.o -Map
u-boot.map -o u-boot
start.o: In function `_start_cont':
/share/home/clemens/work/u-boot/u-boot-1.3.0-rc3/cpu/mpc85xx
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 22:31 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00308.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 22:35 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
ld seems to fails before it starts to resolve the external (in the testcase
_not_ included) references. I'll have to check more in detail. Any hints?
Without a testcase, I can't tell
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-18 01:31 ---
The current patch is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00257.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-16 17:56 ---
A new patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00240.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-16 18:22 ---
The current assembler just ignores
.type common,%common
by default:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ cat x.s
.common foo, 1
.type foo,%common
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ ./as-new -o x.o x.s
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 16:33 ---
*** Bug 5176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 16:33 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5149 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 ---
An updated patch for i386/FreeBSD is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00215.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 ---
*** Bug 5179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4424 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-11 15:49 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ gcc -v x.o
...
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -m
elf_x86_64 --hash-style=gnu -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 18:05 ---
If you can provide a testcase, I will look into it.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 18:12 ---
I don't have a Sparc. I can build a cross linker. I need all linker inputs
to reproduce it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 22:04 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created an attachment (id=2039)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2039action=view)
ld bits that make strange sparc file which fails elfutils test
That is not enough
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-09 14:03 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 02:26 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00079.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 02:29 ---
Does
# ld.exe -r --whole-archive ..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a
work?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 04:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Subject: Re: x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the
archive file
your command works.
I add some log in bfd_seek() and bfd_pread(),
it seems that the file offset
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-01 16:56 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Thanks, so i tried following action.
root:/sources/grub-0.97# vi +1852 stage2/asm.S
-and $0x, %rsi
+and $0x, %rsi
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-30 18:19 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I rebuild whole system with lfs, binutils testcase seems fine.
But i want to know the reason why grub-0.97 has been failed.
Still got
asm.S:1852: Error: suffix or operands invalid
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-30 21:27 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00443.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-29 23:19 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00413.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl at lucon dot org
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-25 13:52 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
need to rebuild all gcc toolchain again, something is wrong..
Your system is corrupted. Binutils 2.18 should have no problems on Linux/x86-64.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-24 13:31 ---
Please provide a testcase. Objcopy works for me:
bash-3.2$ cat x.c
void
cmain (void)
{
*((int *) 0x1000) = 2;
}
bash-3.2$ make
cc -O2 -c -o x.o x.c
./ld -o x x.o -N -Ttext 0x100
./ld: warning: cannot find entry
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-24 13:32 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
What is wrong with .eh_frame? then linker is not working?
or binutils works fine? i am not sure, so tried following action.
callEXT_C(stop
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-23 23:31 ---
I have no idea what grub is trying to do. Please extract a testcase from grub.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-17 14:48 ---
According to
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00213.html
it is invalid MASM assembly code. The fix has been reverted.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:35 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00229.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:36 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00229.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:37 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:37 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 19:56 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00208.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 22:14 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00209.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 22:15 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/temp/tmingw
$ /c/tools/target/bin/as.exe t2.s -o t2.o
t2.s: Assembler messages:
t2.s:67: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.hidden'
../../src/gas/config
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 20:37 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I compile a cross compiler --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-mingw32,
Then use this cross compiler to compile a native binutils and gcc,
Then I run the native x86_64-pc
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5034
--- You are receiving this mail
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5026
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 20:58 ---
The current binutils in CVS shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] big-1]$ cat x.s
.word 0x1234567890
[EMAIL PROTECTED] big-1]$ make
./as -o x.o x.s
x.s: Assembler messages:
x.s:1: Warning: bignum truncated to 2 bytes
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 22:10 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00202.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 01:35 ---
Does it with the current Linux binutils?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 03:19 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
current 2.18 branch as well as CVS head exhibit same bug as the 2.18 release
In Linux binutils source tree, there is a patch for bug 3281 under patches
You can try it on binutils from CVS
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-01 06:51 ---
I checked in my patch. But it doesn't work on ia64 with gcc 3.4 and 4.1.
I got
Line Number Statements:
Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x0
Special opcode 12: advance Address by 0 to 0x0 and Line by 7 to 8
1 - 100 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
