[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-12-01 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-12-01 13:46 --- Created an attachment (id=4434) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4434&action=view) Solution based on COFF_PAGE_SIZE Antother solution could be to use COFF_PAGE_SI

[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-25 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-11-25 12:44 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Random comment coming out of the woodwork: > I can't help thinking that you should change this and all uses to > TARGET_PAGE_SIZE and TARGET_PAGE_MASK, and the

[Bug binutils/11017] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
n dlltool.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com C

[Bug binutils/11016] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
n dlltool.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com C

[Bug binutils/11014] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c

2009-11-24 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
n dlltool.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com C

[Bug binutils/10798] New: variable declare inside code block in binutils/dlltool.c

2009-10-17 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
tils/dlltool.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC:

[Bug binutils/10793] New: gcc cant get pass unused code in binutils/prdbg.c

2009-10-16 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
sion: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet

[Bug binutils/10792] New: variable declare inside code block in binutils/dlltool.c

2009-10-16 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
tils/dlltool.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC:

[Bug binutils/10785] memory access violation in bfd/opncls.c

2009-10-16 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 20:29 --- Problem gone in both 64bit and 32bit builds Thanks -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10785 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-15 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-10-15 23:32 --- Problem solved, the code now compiles Thanks! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10767 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are

[Bug admin/10785] New: memory access violation in bfd/opncls.c

2009-10-15 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
s Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: admin AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org G

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-13 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-10-13 16:51 --- Oh, it was not meant as a fix. Just as an information. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10767 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug admin/10767] New: opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-13 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin AssignedTo: drow at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-inte

[Bug gas/10766] New: Variable defined inside code in gas/config/tc-i386.c

2009-10-13 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1 GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1 GCC target triplet: x86_64-

[Bug binutils/10764] New: compiler option added after operands

2009-10-13 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
rands Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com CC

[Bug admin/10763] New: variable defined inside code in elf32-i386.c

2009-10-13 Thread jerker dot back at gmail dot com
le defined inside code in elf32-i386.c Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin AssignedTo: drow at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot c