https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24403
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
Hi Nick
Thank you for pinpointing the library.
ok I filed with gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90039
Cheers, Jonny
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24404
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3)
> My comment about silly arguments was aimed mostly at [3]. You're passing
> __libc_start_main+0xe7 as an address.
ok, got those removed now.
> For [2], the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24404
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Test case is passing silly arguments to addr2line.
Unclear what you mean? Please clarify.
Easy to reproduce:
addr2line -e exception4 0x15c1
--
You are
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jg at jguk dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11715
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11715=edit
test case
It feels like addr2line is not outputting valid file:l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24403
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
Looks like it is just the "_GLOBAL__sub_I_" prefix which isn't recognised.
$ c++filt _GLOBAL__sub_I__Z11print_tracev
_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z11print_tracev
$
$ c++filt _Z11print_tracev
print_trace()
$
$ c++filt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24403
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Grant ---
Created attachment 11713
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11713=edit
compiled file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jg at jguk dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11712
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11712=edit
test case
The attached test case, when compiled and run shows a sym
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant ---
It's a surprising that the patch clarifying bison, flex, texinfo packages are
required in the README was not considered useful. At the moment, every new
developer has 1 hour of time wasted before they can
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #17 from Jonny Grant ---
Could I ask if this message could be expanded to give more clues if ever it
occurs again in a future build?
"/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or
equal to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #5 from Jon Grant ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> The purpose of "missing" as explained in the automake manual isn't to
> replace the missing tools, just to give a more informative error message
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #15 from Jon Grant ---
Many thanks
I built from git, and checked locally. The other "abrev" issue, and "Dwarf
Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846)." no
longer visible.
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #3 from Jon Grant ---
Created attachment 11286
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11286=edit
clarify bison, flex, texinfo packages are required
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #2 from Jon Grant ---
Hi Nick!
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Hi Jon,
>
> > 1)
> > Is there a way for ./configure to check for "makeinfo" "bison" "flex"
> > commands first? I just get it bailing out at the end half
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jg at jguk dot org
Target Milestone: ---
1)
Is there a way for ./configure to check for "makeinfo" "bison" "flex" commands
first? I just get it bailing out at the end half way through a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #11 from Jon Grant ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> Created attachment 11227 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
Hi H.J.
Could you attach you Ld binary please? I'm on x64 Ubuntu
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #8 from Jon Grant ---
Another type of message shows up. Maybe it could be updated to clarify what the
info pointer was pointing to?
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: Dwarf Error: Info pointer extends beyond end of
attributes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #7 from Jon Grant ---
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (57611527) greater than or
equal to .debug_str size (5853).
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: Dwarf Error: Invalid abstract instance DIE ref.
Can LD at least
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #6 from Jon Grant ---
/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 113.
I get this output above as well. Could LD add a string to give more of a clue
what 113 relates to? Just store the string with the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #5 from Jon Grant ---
There's a testcase for the first attached. Can that be worked on first?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
Jon Grant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jg at jguk dot org
--
You are receiving
iority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jg at jguk dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Could the linker output a clearer message?
Expected:
$ g++ -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -m32 -o main main.cpp
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible x68_64
/u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--- Comment #8 from Jon Grant ---
ok, yes, great to just have a message.
Regards, Jon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--- Comment #6 from Jon Grant ---
Hi Nick
Great!
Yes, maybe mine is too old. I'm on Ubuntu LTS binutils 2.26.1
Do you think okay to be a Warning as opposed to Error? the "gold" linker calls
it a fatal error.
$ gold mydir
gold: fatal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--- Comment #3 from Jon Grant ---
Great Nick!
$ ld mydir
ld: cannot find mydir: File format not recognised
$ ar p mydir
ar: mydir: File format not recognised
I had a look at the others, I saw they have this kind of output below. Perhaps
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jg at jguk dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Existing output
===
$ strings mydir
$ strings missingfile
strings: 'missingfile': No such file
My feeling is that there should be a message for 'mydir
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12974
Summary: ld undefined reference shows wrong line number
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo:
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-02-14 20:12 ---
Hi Nick
Patch works perfectly. Thanks for taking the time to work on it.
I tried a few different reconfigures, makes, and make distclean
Cheers, Jon
p.s. I did try ./configure CFLAGS=-Wconversion that doesn't get
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-02-06 12:45 ---
Hi Nick
Thank you for checking. I found it requires a particular sequence to reproduce
this problem. I checked out the latest CVS to verify this just now.
./configure
make
./configure CFLAGS=-g
make
{see the compile
: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11238
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-01-30 15:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=4565)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4565action=view)
configure log
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11238
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-01-21 22:03 ---
Hi Nick. Thanks for updating for other files + applying the patch. Cheers, Jon
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4437
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-01-20 17:18 ---
2010-01-19 Jon Grant jg at jguk org
* ldlang.h: Add missing_file flag.
* ldlang.c: Initialise missing_file flag to FALSE. In addition don't
try use
bfd if library was missing. After checking all
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |jg at jguk dot org
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-01-19 21:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=4541)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4541action=view)
Patch implementing this change
Apply this patch to the ld directory
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From jg at jguk dot org 2010-01-19 21:51 ---
I've implemented this feature. Please see attached patch.
Please review, and apply!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4437
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
36 matches
Mail list logo
