https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Labath ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #6)
> FWIW, we may want to revisit the current behavior of the --sframe option
> later for 2.46. As noted here
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-July/14
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Labath ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #2)
> Right, most users will only ever see (and need) SFrame sections with name
> ".sframe".
That's true, but you could also say that (in the future, when everything
g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Labath ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #0)
> Not displaying the section contents with --sframe is fine (as the section
> name is renamed to .sframe2 in the example above). It aligns with the
> expectation (
