[Bug binutils/17532] New: regression: binutils 2.24.90 doesnt support -l:path/to/lib.a syntax anymore

2014-11-02 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de the -l: command line parameter is supposed to be usable with an explicit filename root:/src/build/bash/bash-4.3$ ls -la lib/readline

[Bug ld/17532] regression: binutils 2.24.90 doesnt support -l:path/to/lib.a syntax anymore

2014-11-02 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17532 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You

[Bug ld/17532] regression: binutils 2.24.90 doesnt support -l:path/to/lib.a syntax anymore

2014-11-02 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17532 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-10-25 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7672|0 |1

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-10-25 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #24 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #21) I am sorry but this bug is just not reproducible with the FSF mainline binutils sources. :-( I can only conclude that the bug must

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-10-25 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-08-19 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #22 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- are you sure you're not using a hardfloat toolchain ? those seem to be immune to the bug. anything else i tested is affected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-08-06 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #20 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- (In reply to maillist-gdb from comment #18) i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the latest testcase i was, however able to reproduce the issue

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-07-02 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #17 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- the host (i.e. the machine the compiler runs on) is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (sabotage linux using musl libc). binutils 2.24 was built with these flags: --target=arm-linux-musleabi

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-07-02 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #18 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the latest testcase and pre-compiled musl-cross toolchain from https

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-07-01 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #14 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- Created attachment 7671 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7671action=edit standalone testcase including reduced libc sources while trying to reduce the libc sources

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-07-01 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7638|0 |1

[Bug binutils/16948] recent binutils/bfd release tarballs generated with ancient autoconf version

2014-06-30 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16948 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||16370 -- You

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-30 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #11 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- according to the contents of the abfd variable when the assert is raised, it's caused by the stdin.o and fflush.o object files in libc.a, which both do some weak symbol magic to pull

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-28 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #9 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- Created attachment 7663 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7663action=edit generated object files sorry for the delay; back from holidays. here are the generated obj

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #2 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- ping. anyone up for bisecting this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug gold/16728] gold fails to hide hidden tls symbols

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.25 -- You

[Bug gold/16728] gold fails to hide hidden tls symbols

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728 --- Comment #1 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- ping. fixing this bug is crucial to make gold fit for real-world usage; instead of staying a toy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug gold/16728] gold fails to hide hidden tls symbols

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16728 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical -- You

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #3 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- the bug is present in 2.23.1, 2.23.2, 2.24, and 2.24.51 snapshot from today, but not in 2.22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-06-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maillist-gdb

[Bug binutils/16948] New: recent binutils/bfd release tarballs generated with ancient autoconf version

2014-05-15 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de the release tarballs of binutils 2.24 and gdb 7.6 were generated with an ancient autoconf version (2.64), which causes long-fixed

[Bug binutils/16698] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-03-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de when building git, util-linux, or lzo with the following CFLAGS: -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Os -g0 -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind

[Bug binutils/16698] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24 assertion fail elf32-arm.c:12387

2014-03-12 Thread maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698 --- Comment #1 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de --- the bug #14189 ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 ) may be related. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug