https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
--- Comment #13 from Matt Godbolt ---
Thank you all so much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
--- Comment #7 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi there,
It was failing until pretty recently. Our fix is to go back to 2.35.1 (which is
more sane).
Seems like you've been able to repro: please let me know if I can test
anything!
Cheers all, Matt
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25876
--- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt ---
Thanks for your patience and help here! I never quite know where the boundaries
lie!
Much appreciated, Matt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
iority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: matt at godbolt dot org
Target Milestone: ---
c++filt does not support the new C++ `operator <=>`, instead showing mangled
names like "_ZNK3FoossERKS_".
(Example at https://githu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13442
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #36 from Matt Godbolt ---
Ok; with a GCC 6 snapshot build (20160221) there's no crash when I link with
-fdump-ipa-all
I will tar up the results and send you an email with the link.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #35 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi Honza,
I checkout the branch of my code where the problem exists and confirmed I could
reproduce. Then I re-linked with =-save-temps -fdump-ipa-all and sadly I get an
ICE:
GNU GIMPLE (DRW-internal-bui
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #33 from Matt Godbolt ---
Yes, I can do that. I'll get back to you with the relevant information as
soon as I can.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:23 AM hubicka at ucw dot cz <
sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote:
> https://sour
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #31 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi all,
Just following up on this as it seems to have stalled: @honza, do you concur
this may be a bug in GCC? If so shall I file something, or are you happy to
capture it appropriately?
Thanks, Matt
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #14 from Matt Godbolt ---
I've sent my full results to H.J.Lu and Cary directly. Thanks both.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #13 from Matt Godbolt ---
Thanks, I will do.
grepping the -v output:
$ grep '_ZNSt8functionIFvvEED[12]Ev' gcc_verbose_output
/tmp/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
out/haswell/main/Sy
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #11 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi H.J. Lu,
I've made a build of your binutils, supplied -Wl,-plugin-save-temps and kept
all the files generated. I will share the files with you over email.
Looking at the ltrans1.o file generated with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #9 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi H.J.Hu,
Cary already made a patched binutils (users/ccoutant/gold-record) which does a
similar thing: that's how Cary was able to debug further.
Would it be useful for me to build your branch too and g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #6 from Matt Godbolt ---
I just tried with a snapshot build of GCC I had around (6.0.0 20160221), and
the problem persists:
Dump of assembler code for function std::_List_node
>::~_List_node():
0x0077434c <+0>: push
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #5 from Matt Godbolt ---
Wow! What an awesome diagnosis: thank you so much for digging in to this!
I've tried with GCC 5.3.0 but not any GCC 6+ snapshots. The GCC guys on the
mailing list didn't seem to think it was a GCC bug init
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #3 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi Cary,
The output of even the compiled files is somewhat sensitive. Would it be
possible to email them directly to you instead of placing them here?
Also; the process you described left some .o files as
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: matt at godbolt dot org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I have a large, proprietary project which links with an open source project.
The large project ("
18 matches
Mail list logo
