[Bug gold/11033] gold creates twice time bigger binaries, sometimes

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:22 --- Created an attachment (id=4428) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4428&action=view) gold's readelf -a -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033 --- You a

[Bug gold/11033] gold creates twice time bigger binaries, sometimes

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:22 --- Created an attachment (id=4427) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4427&action=view) ld's readelf -a -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033 --- You a

[Bug gold/11033] gold creates twice time bigger binaries, sometimes

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:21 --- Created an attachment (id=4426) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4426&action=view) gold's pvfnoise -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033 --- You a

[Bug gold/11033] gold creates twice time bigger binaries, sometimes

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:21 --- Created an attachment (id=4425) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4425&action=view) ld's pvfnoise -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033 --- You are re

[Bug gold/11033] New: gold creates twice time bigger binaries, sometimes

t airs dot com ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

[Bug gold/10982] objcopy brings 'invalid operation' when adding debug link section

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) > According to http://bugs.debian.org/556951 it is a Debian specific eglibc bug. Can we close this then? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982 --- You

[Bug gold/10949] output.cc fails with outpu t.cc:3509: error: format �%llxï ¿½ expects type �long long unsigned int �, but argument 2 has type �long unsigned int�

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:02 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=4393) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4393&action=view) > Use PRIx64 instead. Perhaps if you send it to m-l it will be

[Bug gold/10938] There should be a way for ld and gold to coexist

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:59 --- Looks like there were several patches upstream for this issue but none of them made it upstream. I can see that Fedora added former Roland's patch recently. What's the status here? -- http://sour

[Bug gold/10471] hidden symbol gets added to dynamic symbol table

--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:46 --- Shouldn't we close this one? Looks like changes were committed to CVS. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10471 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC lis

[Bug gold/10238] Gold linker does not resolve symbols using indirect dependencies

-- What|Removed |Added CC||mnowak at redhat dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10238 --- You are receiving this