https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #3 from Nelson Chu ---
Created attachment 13232
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13232&action=edit
proposed solution v2
Fixed the conflicts since the v1 patch is too old.
After applying this patch, the "cal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13231|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #2 from Nelson Chu ---
The attached is the proposed solution. We use a new boolean "restart_relax" to
determine if we need to re-run the whole relax passes again from 0 to 2. Once
we have deleted the code between relax pass 0 to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv*-*-*
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27433
--- Comment #1 from Nelson Chu ---
Created attachment 13231
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13231&action=edit
proposed solution
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
We find that the more relax passes, the more chances of relaxations are
reduced.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot
org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27200
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot
org
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo