https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=115166
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
It looks like the link against libstdc++v3.so is not happening ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh note it is with -flto .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Achim from comment #1)
> AFter a few false starts since it seems one really needs to freshly
> configure and compile the whole thing each time this got bisected to:
>
>
||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity|critical|normal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
|---
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code in gas/config/tc-m68hc11.c is undefined:
opc = XNEWVEC (struct m68hc11_opcode_def, num_opcodes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is another thing which could be done is do strchr up front to find the
other : and then match the length and not do the strncasecmp in that case.
That is:
static struct reloc_table_entry *
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 14459
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14459=edit
First attempt at a patch for this
I did not test this and I am not 100% sure about the GNUC check. I need to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|find_reloc_table_entry |find_reloc_table_entry in
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
With -O0 generated code, sometimes strlen shows up high on the perf profiling
of gas.
I looked and saw
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jérôme Forissier from comment #4)
> But then how is it that the LLVM linker (ld.lld) has no problem with that?
> Same, linker script, and even same object files... (it generates 4 LOAD
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reasoning is because the max "page size" on aarch64 is set to 64k so there
is only one segment.
Either change the " . = ALIGN((1 << (12)));" to " . = ALIGN((1 << (14)));"
Or use "-z
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24983
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24983
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28441
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: riscv
Deleting data while doing relaxation is not only slow (see PR 28441) but forces
many real bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28875
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
||/show_bug.cgi?id=49844
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27931
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There was an old (7 years ago) bug filed against GCC about __x86.get_pc_thunk
and "objcopy --keep-global-symbol" (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR59842) which seems
like the same issue here.
--
You are receiving
||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13673
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13673=edit
patch
We should be able to do:
400
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
onent: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Take:
.xword :dtprel:t
A couple of things error message is way off for this.
Second is this is needed to be supported to support debugging informati
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13605|0 |1
is obsolete|
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13605
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13605=edit
test assembly file
>From
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
GCC 10 enables -fno-common by default and we get an extra failure due to that:
/bajas/pinskia/src/toolchain-10/marvell-tools/bin/../lib/gcc/aarch64-marvell-linux-gnu/10.0.0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17670
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16103
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Take:
.text
.align 2
.global Extract_double_from_vector
.type Extract_double_from_vector, %function
Extract_double_from_vector:
mov x0, v0.D
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=596
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13509
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16
22:18:04 UTC ---
The reason why GCC emits LABEL = . is because of the following reason:
* Print debug labels as foo = . rather than foo: because they should
represent
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13509
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16
23:25:39 UTC ---
Looks like this version of the mips patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-10/msg00512.html
Would have fixed it also. But it was rejected and only
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13509
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17
00:38:56 UTC ---
Something like:
Index: config/tc-mips.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/config/tc-mips.c,v
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13509
Bug #: 13509
Summary: branch target to the wrong location
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
62 matches
Mail list logo
