[Bug gas/19520] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X relocation breaks gcc bootstrap with non-gld/gold linker

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/33374] ld incorrectly claims support for some emulations on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ld/33374] ld incorrectly claims support for some emulations on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE | -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/33374] ld incorrectly claims support for some emulations on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33374 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > Not that H.J. needs me to defend his honour, but I'll note that PR33396 > means he surely has used Solaris recently. ... which would be a first as far as I can tell

[Bug libsframe/33168] libsframe tests don't build on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|https://sou

[Bug ld/33350] New: Several readelf GOT tests FAIL

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11, amd64-pc-solaris2.11, amd64-pc-freebsd14.0 Several of the new readelf GOT tests

[Bug ld/33350] Several readelf GOT tests FAIL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33350 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16297 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16297&action=edit Solaris/amd64 and i386 libgot-so.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/33350] Several readelf GOT tests FAIL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33350 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16296 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16296&action=edit Partial patch 2025-08-31 Rainer Orth ld: * testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp (target_emulation):

[Bug binutils/33349] New: readelf lacks PLT support

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I recently noticed that readelf has no support for displaying PLTs. However, Solaris elfdump does with the -L option. The output differs

[Bug libsframe/33168] libsframe tests don't build on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://sourceware.org/pipe |https://sourceware.org/pipe

[Bug ld/33237] No PLT (PIE 1[fg]) FAIL on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16275 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16275&action=edit Reduced testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33237] No PLT (PIE 1[fg]) FAIL on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libsframe/33168] libsframe tests don't build on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://sourceware.org/pipe

[Bug ld/33237] No PLT (PIE 1[fg]) FAIL on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Actually, for the link with /bin/ld to succeed one needs -z textoff, otherwise one gets Text relocation remains referenced against symbol offset in file fun

[Bug binutils/33243] gnu-debuglink (objdump 1) FAILs on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33243 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16216 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16216&action=edit Test objects -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/33243] New: gnu-debuglink (objdump 1) FAILs on Solaris/amd64

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: amd64-pc-solaris2.11 The "gnu-debuglink (objdump 1)" test FAILs on Solaris/amd64 (only, i386, sparc, and sparcv9 are fine): FAIL: gnu

[Bug ld/33238] Build libpr23161c.so FAILs on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33238 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16213 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16213&action=edit Input objects and ld-produced shared object. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug ld/33238] New: Build libpr23161c.so FAILs on Solaris/amd64

: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: amd64-pc-solaris2.11 The "Build libpr23161c.so" test FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86: FAIL: Build libpr23161c.so FAIL: Build pr23161c ./ld-new

[Bug ld/33237] No PLT (PIE 1[fg]) FAIL on Solaris/amd64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16212 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16212&action=edit Input objects, gld- and ld-produced executables of no-plt-1g -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug ld/33237] New: No PLT (PIE 1[fg]) FAIL on Solaris/amd64

: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: amd64-pc-solaris2.11 Two tests FAIL on 64-bit Solaris/x86: FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g) Both abort. When single-stepping, I find that this

[Bug binutils/33214] New: sparc LDM/STM/LDMA/STMA etc. FAIL on Solaris/SPARC

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jose.marchesi at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11 Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11 Build: sparc

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|2.44|2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

||rmail/binutils/2025-July/14 ||2922.html Assignee|nickc at redhat dot com|ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth --- I've now found a way to automate this. Patch p

[Bug ld/33202] New: ld-gc/all-debug-sections.d FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/SPARC

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 There's one ld testsuite failure on 64-bit Solaris/SPARC only: FAIL: --gc-sections with mul

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org --- Comment

[Bug ld/33199] New: SEGV in _bfd_x86_elf_create_sframe_plt

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jpoimboe at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: amd64-pc-solaris2.11 On 64-bit Solaris/x86, 3 ld tests FAIL: FAIL: LTO 4a FAIL: LTO 4c FAIL: LTO 4d The failure

[Bug ld/33177] New: pr26590 etc. FAIL due to Solaris ABI symbols

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 A couple of ld tests FAIL on Solaris for the same reason: FAIL: Build pr26590 (1) FAIL: Run with pr14862-1.c libpr14862.so FAIL: pr26580-3 The

[Bug ld/33169] New: Some pr25617-1 tests FAIL on Solaris

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 Some of the pr25617-1 tests FAIL on Solaris (both SPARC and x86): FAIL: Build pr25617-1 (-z

[Bug libsframe/33168] New: libsframe tests don't build on Solaris

frame Assignee: indu.bhagat at oracle dot com Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: *-*-solaris2.11 Target: *-*-solaris2.11 Build: *-*-solaris2.11 I just noticed during make -k check that the libsframe tests don'

[Bug libctf/33162] New: Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: nick.alcock at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 Once PR libctf/29292 is fixed, there are only two ld-ctf failures remaining on Solaris: FAIL: Diagnostics

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nick.alcock at oracle dot com --- Comme

[Bug ld/33153] [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 16180 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16180&action=edit Revised patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33153] New: [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 binutils 2.45 ld (tested with current 2.44.90) completely broke linking on Solaris: $ gcc -o m

[Bug ld/33153] [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 15894 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15894&action=edit proposed patch (hack?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.44 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug ld/32580] New: [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: nickc at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 When trying the binutils 2.44 branch on Solaris, I found

[Bug gas/32579] [2.44 regression] Support for x86 Sun cmov syntax is incomplete

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.44 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug gas/32579] New: [2.44 regression] Support for x86 Sun cmov syntax is incomplete

Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jbeulich at suse dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11, amd64-pc-solaris2.11 I just tried gcc trunk bootstraps

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Resolution|---

[Bug libctf/30013] New: [2.40 regression] Assertion failed: one_type != two_type, file libctf/ctf-dedup.c, line 2342, function sort_output_mapping

Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libctf Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: nick.alcock at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- When I

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://sourceware.org/pipe

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #30 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #28) > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #27) > > Created attachment 14577 [details] > > Augmented patch, incorporating review comments > > expected_tls_le should be u

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #29 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 14590 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14590&action=edit Augmented^2 patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14568|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #25 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 14568 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14568&action=edit Augmented patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth -

[Bug ld/29512] New: ld non-canon ref to canon protected function check breaks Solaris/x86

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: i?86-pc-solaris2.11 Target: i?86-pc-solaris2.11

[Bug ld/29411] ld warning on SPARC: LOAD segment with RWX permissions

||https://sourceware.org/pipe ||rmail/binutils/2022-July/12 ||2057.html Target Milestone|--- |2.39 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ro at gcc

[Bug ld/29424] ld chokes on DW_FORM_rnglistx

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29424 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 14237 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14237&action=edit Debian 11/sparc64 testcse I see the binutils bugzilla filesize limit is way larger than GCC's, so attaching

[Bug ld/29424] New: ld chokes on DW_FORM_rnglistx

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Build: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu When building LLVM main on Debian 11/sparc64, I ran into a

[Bug ld/29411] New: ld warning on SPARC: LOAD segment with RWX permissions

Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, sparc64-sun-linux-gnu Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, sparc64-sun-linux-gnu Build: sparcv9-sun

[Bug libctf/29292] New: Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.11 When building binutils trunk with gcc 12.1.0, several CTF tests FAIL: FAIL: Arrays (conflicted) FAIL: Conflicting cycle 1.B-1 FAIL: Conflicting

[Bug libctf/29291] New: ld-ctf/data-func-conflicted*.d FAIL with -g3 -O0

Component: libctf Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: amd64--c-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu When investigating a different CTF issue on Solaris, I built binutils trunk with gcc 12.1.0 -g3 -O0

[Bug binutils/27666] ar doesn't create indices on Solaris/sparcv9

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27666 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.37 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/27666] New: ar doesn't create indices on Solaris/sparcv9

y: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.* On binutils master, quite a number of tests currently fail on Solaris/sp

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 12618 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12618&action=edit ld-elf/eh5 readelf -wf output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 12617 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12617&action=edit ld-elf/eh5 elfdump -u output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25802] New: Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: davem at davemloft dot net, jose.marchesi at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ld/22840] New: Several TLS tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.* Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.* Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.* Several of the ld TLS tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC

[Bug ld/22839] New: Several plugin tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC

Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 When running make check on 32-bit Solaris

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 10807 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10807&action=edit assembler output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22823] bfd/libbfd.h:268:4: error: cast between incompatible function types from ‘bfd_boolean (*)(bfd *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct bfd *)’} to ‘bfd_boolean (*)(bfd *, bfd *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(st

||2018-02-09 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |2.31 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- I'm seeing the same (a regression, if you can call it

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com V

[Bug ld/22732] New: Test failures on targets without support for all-static binaries

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-solaris2.* A couple of ld testcases FAIL on Solaris because that platform doesn't support all-static bin

[Bug ld/22727] New: [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: 2.30 Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.11 Target: sparc

[Bug ld/22721] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.30 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug ld/22721] New: [2.30, 2.31 regression] Solaris/x86 TLS transition failures with linker plugin

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: i386-pc-solaris2.11 Target: i386-pc

[Bug ld/21251] New: Support $SYSROOT in ld -L and INPUT command

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Using = to refer to the sysroot prefix in both the -L option and the INPUT command is not very expressive/mnemonic. It would seem useful to additionall support $SYSROOT similarly to

[Bug ld/21250] New: ld --sysroot without --with-sysroot searches default dirs

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Playing around with gcc --sysroot, I noticed a weird ld behaviour. I've observed this with native gcc mainline and gld 2.28, on both i3

[Bug ld/20989] Every 64-bit Solaris 12/SPARC executable dies with SIGILL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20989 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 9722 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9722&action=edit input objects and executables -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/20989] New: Every 64-bit Solaris 12/SPARC executable dies with SIGILL

Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.12 Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.12 Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.12 For some time, Solaris

[Bug ld/20179] New: ld -pie -z text errors out for SPARC TLS objects: read-only segment has dynamic relocations

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.* Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.* Build: sparc*-sun

[Bug gas/20118] New: gas should set .init_array etc. sh_entsize to word size

Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Solaris elfdump complains about sh_entsize being 0for .init_array etc. sections. The following example is on Solaris/x86, but the same applies to