--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2009-02-14 14:18 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
sed -e '/^=/,/^=/!d;/^=/d'\
-e 's/\. = 0 + SIZEOF_HEADERS;/ _begin = . -
SIZEOF_HEADERS;/' \
This command is broken
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2009-01-21 12:43 ---
Subject: Re: [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error
nickc at redhat dot com sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org writes:
Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2009-01-06 09:07 ---
The compiler always creates a writeable .jcr section, thus its default
placement is in the data segment.
--
What|Removed |Added
at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ia64-*-*
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7036
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-17 17:43 ---
The testcase is available in
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/schwab/libjava.tar.bz2.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7036
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-16 18:37 ---
Dynamic relocations typically don't apply to the (read-only) text segment, so
it is no surprise that there are no relocations to be displayed.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7034
--- You
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-10 22:49 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
GCC target
: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i586-*-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7011
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-06 15:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=3045)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3045action=view)
Testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7011
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-10-29 08:39 ---
It doesn't make sense for the assembler to use such suffixes, since the size of
the number is completely defined by the context, unlike C.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6994
--- You
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-10-30 00:14 ---
You can easily make that dependent on __ASSEMBLER__.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6994
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-10-25 22:53 ---
Neither gdb nor gdbtk are part of binutils. And the patch is as broken as the
original code, it still fails on big-endian 64-bit architectures. Please
report that to the insight mailinglist.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-10-11 14:40 ---
In MRI mode, 1b is a number in base 2. MRI mode is only for compatibility with
existing MRI assembler code, don't use it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-06-26 09:02 ---
Please try the latest sources from CVS.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-08 19:25 ---
spam
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-04-04 15:46 ---
usb_busses is a variable, not a function.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-03-31 22:15 ---
The problem appears to be that the INTERP segment has a lot of sections
besides .interp lumped together:
$ readelf -l script_test_3
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point 0x1480
There are 5
Priority: P2
Component: gold
AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i386-suse-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5996
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-27 15:47 ---
How did you configure binutils, and how is the assembler invoked?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-27 16:30 ---
Never mind, I was able to reproduce it with -m5249.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-25 20:04 ---
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/shell-differences/
sh csh ksh bash tcsh zsh rc es
Shell functions Y(1) NYYNYYY
1
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-18 17:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=2205)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2205action=view)
Testcase part 2
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5646
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-18 17:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=2204)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2204action=view)
Testcase part 1
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5646
--- You are receiving this mail
in ppc64_elf_tls_optimize
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-13 12:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=2195)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2195action=view)
Testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5604
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-13 12:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=2196)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2196action=view)
Testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5604
--- You are receiving this mail because
dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au,bug-binutils at gnu dot
org,rsandifo at sourceware dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5604
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-08 13:55 ---
The assembler output is already broken.
foo.o: file format elf32-fr30
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
0004 R_FR30_32 foo+0x0004
0008 R_FR30_32 foo
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-02 23:37 ---
These are all one-time uses, so they don't really leak.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5536
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-12-08 09:38 ---
You can split the cpush line, one for m68040up, as many as needed for mcfisa_a
to not match the nc case.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5457
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-12-07 23:19 ---
According to the M68000PRM a cache field of 0 is valid for both cpush and cinv.
The change needs to be restricted to the ColdFire.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5457
--- You
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-10-02 16:14 ---
1 is odd, not even.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-10-02 21:44 ---
How did you configure it? target_alias should never be empty.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-09-25 17:21 ---
linux-2.6/include/asm-m68k/user.h:#define NBPG 4096
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4989
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-08-28 08:49 ---
You did not configure glibc correctly. You should use --prefix=/usr and
install it with install_root=${sysroot}. The whole point of the sysroot
feature is that it establishes a chroot style environment
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-06-19 22:22 ---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gcore.exp
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au,bug-binutils at gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-06-09 10:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=1885)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1885action=view)
readelf -Wa gcore.test (after change)
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4606
--- You
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at specifixinc dot
||com
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-24 10:23 ---
Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
Nick Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Vincent,
Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode.
This is because you
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-19 14:49 ---
None of the options are portable and supported by POSIX.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-14 13:43 ---
The removed program headers now breaks ia64:
BFD: a.debug: warning: allocated section `.IA_64.unwind' not in segment
The .IA_64.unwind section has SHT_IA64_UNWIND instead of SHT_NOBITS in the
output
--
Bug 4144 depends on bug 4479, which changed state.
Bug 4479 Summary: objcopy --only-keep-debug broken
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|4144|
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|4479|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4144
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-10 17:18 ---
From tc-m68k.h:
/* Target *-*-elf implies an embedded target. No shared libs.
*-*-uclinux also requires special casing to prevent GAS from
generating unsupported R_68K_PC16 relocs. */
#define
: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-09 17:55 ---
To reproduce the bug (where objcopy.old has the patch for PR4144 reverted):
$ cat hello.c
#include stdio.h
int
main (void)
{
printf (Hello, world!\n);
}
$ gcc -g hello.c -o hello
$ objcopy.old --only-keep-debug
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at bigpond dot net
||dot au
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-04-20 10:44 ---
You must use a PIC call.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: x86-64-*-*
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4029
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-02-12 16:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=1549)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1549action=view)
Testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4029
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2006-07-06 14:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=1144)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1144action=view)
Testcase
libc.so.6.1 omitted due to size constraints.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2884
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i586-*-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2513
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 16:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=783)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=783action=view)
Output of objcopy -g
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 16:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=782)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=782action=view)
Test object
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving this mail
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,hjl at lucon dot org
GCC target triplet: ia64-*-*
http://sourceware.org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 17:07 ---
The problem is that elf_discarded_section points to the input section, but
this is not the linker.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving this mail because
63 matches
Mail list logo
