[Bug ld/28870] relocation R_386_GOT32 against absolute symbol is disallowed

2022-02-07 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org

[Bug ld/26688] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2021-02-06 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ld/26688] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2020-09-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 12878 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12878=edit mapfile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26688] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2020-09-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688 --- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 12877 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12877=edit libgcc object files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26688] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2020-09-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688 --- Comment #1 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 12876 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12876=edit gcc -v -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26688] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2020-09-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26688 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||bfin-linux- -- You

[Bug ld/26688] New: ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for bfin-linux

2020-09-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- Hi, following commit breaks the building of a bfin-linux- toolchain targeting FDPIC binaries. commit

[Bug ld/26589] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for crisv32-linux

2020-09-16 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26589 --- Comment #8 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi, the build completes, I can confirm that the bug is fixed. thanks Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26589] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for crisv32-linux

2020-09-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26589 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 12828 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12828=edit gcc -v -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26589] New: ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for crisv32-linux

2020-09-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12826 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12826=edit uClibc ld.so archive When building a uCl

[Bug ld/26589] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for crisv32-linux

2020-09-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26589 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||crisv32-linux -- You

[Bug ld/26589] ld segfaulting building uClibc-ng 1.0.35 for crisv32-linux

2020-09-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26589 --- Comment #1 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 12827 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12827=edit libgcc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #23 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, I can provide you shell access to a server with all stuff precompiled showing the error if you want? best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-12 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #21 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10730 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10730=edit regression introduced by second patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-12 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #20 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, It is getting better, the testcase works, the uClibc utils are compilable, but compilation of busybox fails now. See regression2.txt. best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-11 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #18 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, A link to all files is okay? https://debug.openadk.org/bfin/ best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/13352] microblaze linker relocation bug: R_MICROBLAZE_64_NONE

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13352 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- sorry for the spam, bugzilla took me to next bug and I didn't see it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #16 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10725 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10725=edit regression introduced by patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug ld/13352] microblaze linker relocation bug: R_MICROBLAZE_64_NONE

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13352 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #15 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, I just rebuild binutils with the patch and the testcase compiled. But afterwards I have done a complete rebuild of toolchain and base system and attached regression appeared (double

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #13 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, all attached. best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #12 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10722 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10722=edit test.o object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #11 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10721 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10721=edit libuClibc.so shared library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #10 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10720 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10720=edit ld-uClibc.so shared library loader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #9 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10719 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10719=edit libgcc_eh.a static archive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #8 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10718 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10718=edit libgcc.a static archive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #7 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10717 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10717=edit crtendS.o object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #6 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10716 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10716=edit crtend.o object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #5 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10715 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10715=edit crtbeginS.o object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10714 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10714=edit crtbegin.o object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10713 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10713=edit gcc verbose linker output gcc -Wl,-verbose output -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-07 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org

[Bug binutils/22512] New: lm32 fdpic toolchain segfault with binutils ld

2017-11-28 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- When trying to cross-compile Linux and uClibc-ng for lm32 binutils ld segfaults. Support for FDPIC

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #16 from wbx at openadk dot org --- works great. Thanks. Might be a candidate for 2.28 stable branch :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-11 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #5 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Missing files and log added. For the ld verbose output: https://debug.openadk.org/crisv10/gcc-v.log Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-10 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Here is the build log from the toolchain, all libs involved in the final link and the last command output with -Wl,-M. https://debug.openadk.org/crisv10/ It happens when the final libc.so

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-05 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||cris-linux-uclibc

[Bug ld/21180] ld segfault for microblaze when --gc-sections is used

2017-02-24 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21180 --- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Works for me. No segfaults anymore, certutil application inside libnss shows no problems. Thanks for the bugfix, Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug ld/21180] ld segfault for microblaze when --gc-sections is used

2017-02-22 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21180 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||microblaze

[Bug ld/21180] New: ld segfault for microblaze when --gc-sections is used

2017-02-17 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- The buildroot autobuilders found two packages which are failing to compile for microblaze, because ld segfaults. This happens with binutils 2.26.1, but can

[Bug ld/21017] [microblaze] ld fails with missing _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol when all relocs are @GOTOFF

2017-01-02 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21017 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org

[Bug ld/20675] [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-11-17 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 --- Comment #6 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Thanks Nick for looking into this. I think the patch is the best we can do for now. It seems more likely a gcc bug then a uClibc-ng problem. I can do the static toolchain test builds for all other

[Bug ld/20675] [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-11-13 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 --- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Files uploaded. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 --- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org --- The problem exist for musl, uClibc-ng and glibc based root filesystems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|microblaze: generates |microblaze: generates

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux/musl

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux/musl

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- diff between working and non-working: --- libc.so.readelf 2016-10-30 16:12:27.851976927 +0100 +++ libc.so.readelf.good2016-10-30 16:45:54.121833285 +0100 @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ 0x0006

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux/musl

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 --- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 9603 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9603=edit libc.so readily -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug binutils/20748] microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux/musl

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 --- Comment #1 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 9602 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9602=edit init readelf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug binutils/20748] New: microblaze: generates broken binaries for Linux/musl

2016-10-30 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- While testing newer versions of binutils I found a problem creating a usable Linux root filesystem for Qemu/microblaze using musl C library. I

[Bug ld/20675] [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-10-15 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 --- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org --- See http://debug.openadk.org/metag for the c file and the object file produced. In lib is the static uClibc-ng library files. The Link command I use: /home/wbx/metag/toolchain_qemu-metag_uclibc

[Bug ld/20675] [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-10-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||metag-openadk-linux-uclibc

[Bug ld/20675] New: [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-10-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: wbx at openadk dot org Target Milestone: --- I started regular testing for static linked binaries and found following issue with binutils for metag. I get following error when cross-compiling one

[Bug ld/17334] building gcc-4.5.4 hits BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.25 assertion fail elf32-bfin.c:4457

2016-03-25 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #10 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi, yes, this change works for me. Tested with binutils 2.26 and git. best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/17334] building gcc-4.5.4 hits BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.25 assertion fail elf32-bfin.c:4457

2016-03-19 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #8 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, it still happens with gcc/binutils git from today: /bin/bash /home/wbx/bfin/toolchain_build_sim-bfin_uclibc-ng_bf512/w-gcc-git-1/gcc-git/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs . /home/wbx/bfin

[Bug ld/17334] building gcc-4.5.4 hits BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.25 assertion fail elf32-bfin.c:4457

2016-02-27 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.25|2.26 --- Comment #6 from wbx

[Bug ld/19516] microblaze: invalid symbol indices in GLOB_DAT relocs

2016-01-23 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org

[Bug gas/9785] frv: whether code is accepted depends on whether the *host* is 32bit or 64bit

2015-11-23 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug gas/9785] frv: whether code is accepted depends on whether the *host* is 32bit or 64bit

2015-11-23 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785 --- Comment #9 from wbx at openadk dot org --- The host is 64 bit, sorry forget to tell. uname -a Linux chrom 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.68-1+deb7u4 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[Bug ld/17334] compilation of blackfin toolchain fails

2015-03-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 8179 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8179action=edit buildroot log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/17334] compilation of blackfin toolchain fails

2015-03-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.24|2.25 -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/17334] compilation of blackfin toolchain fails

2015-03-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 8180 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8180action=edit buildroot config -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/17334] compilation of blackfin toolchain fails

2015-03-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/17334] compilation of blackfin toolchain fails

2015-03-08 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 --- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi, I added the buildroot config and full log. best regards Waldemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug