--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 15:26
---
Hi H.J.
> Should we set exit_status to 1 when issuing a warning? Thanks.
Yup. Fixed. I have checked the patch in along with a couple of fixes to the
testsuites for tests that were affected by the change.
Chee
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28
15:25 ---
Subject: Bug 11225
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2010-01-28 15:25:20
Modified files:
ld/testsuite : ChangeLog
ld/testsuite/ld-sh
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-28
14:18 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=4562)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4562&action=view)
> Improved patch
>
Should we set exit_status to 1 when issuing a warning?
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:40
---
Hi H.J.
Ah - I should have run some regression tests before uploading that first patch
- it breaks checks in the GAS testsuite that use multiple -j switches to match
different possible names for data sections in
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:39
---
Created an attachment (id=4562)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4562&action=view)
Improved patch
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:09
---
Hi H.J.
Is the uploaded patch OK with you ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 12:09
---
Created an attachment (id=4561)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4561&action=view)
Issue warning for unseen sections mentioned in -j switches
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
