https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
David Kredba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nheghathivhistha at gmail dot
com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Bug 13227 depends on bug 14698, which changed state.
Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in
BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
What|Re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
> Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in
> BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
Will we now get some so
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
>
> --- Comment #2 from hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
> > Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
*** Bug 15300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> So is it sufficient (and safe) to warn just on the presence of
> __gnu_slim_lto?
Yes, I think so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
> So is it sufficient (and safe) to warn just on the presence of __gnu_slim_lto?
Yes, when __gnu_slim_lto gets into linking/archiving/nm, I think it is safe to
warn about
missing plugin.
Honza
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #10 from hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
> Fixed
Thanks, does this also cover gold linker?
Honza
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
No, I didn't do anything about gold.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 7730
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7730&action=edit
gold patch
This should fix gold
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Bug 13227 depends on bug 14698, which changed state.
Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in
BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
What|Re
17 matches
Mail list logo