[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2024-03-15 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2017-07-03 Thread james.reynolds at cristie dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 James Reynolds changed: What|Removed |Added CC||james.reynolds at cristie dot com -

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-09-22 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to ging...@adacore.com from comment #9) > Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch): > > +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS > +static const char *plugin_target = "plug

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-09-22 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #11 from gingold at adacore dot com --- On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:58, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 > > --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- > (In reply to ging

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-09-22 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #9 from gingold at adacore dot com --- Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch): +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS +static const char *plugin_target = "plugin"; +#else static const char *plugin_target = NULL

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-09-22 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to ging...@adacore.com from comment #7) > Hello, > > I think the patch is not correct. > > Unless --target is specified, it creates archives using the "plugin" target, > which may not be

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-09-22 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 gingold at adacore dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-04-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-04-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-04-02 Thread rhill at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Ryan Hill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org -- You are r

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther --- Patch that seems to work for me: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-01/msg00213.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||13227 -- You are receiving this m

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-01-21 Thread nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #2 from David Kredba --- What about to keep it open and attach the patch and update it if needed? This functionality have to be implemented in Binutils in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-01-21 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

2014-01-20 Thread nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 David Kredba changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com --