https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich ---
Isn't this effectively (despite being older) a duplicate of 16893, and hence
has been fixed along long ago, with that other report?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
--- Comment #3 from Pedro Alves ---
*** Bug 16089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils maili
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
--- Comment #2 from Evgeny ---
(In reply to Grigory Rechistov from comment #1)
> The problem is present not just for MULSD but for many x86 instructions that
> are encoded with a mandatory prefix (e.g. 0xF2), but also are allowed to
> have opt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
Grigory Rechistov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grigory.rechistov@phystech.
