https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #1 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the bug #14189 ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 ) may be
related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #2 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
ping.
anyone up for bisecting this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #3 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the bug is present in 2.23.1, 2.23.2, 2.24, and 2.24.51 snapshot from today,
but not in 2.22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail do
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maillist-gdb at barfo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hp at sourceware dot org |
--- Comment #5 from Hans
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
Ronald Wahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ronald.wahl at raritan dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
The testcase is missing a definition of the function pcap_offline_read().
If a dummy one is supplied then the test compiles and links without any
problems - except for a few warnings from gcc about assignm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7634|0 |1
is obsolete
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 7639
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7639&action=edit
Built executable
I must be doing something wrong, because I am able to build the executable.
(See the uploa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #9 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7663
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7663&action=edit
generated object files
sorry for the delay; back from holidays.
here are the generated obj
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Sorry - I still cannot reproduce this problem, even with the object file and
library. :-( The external symbols that I am pulling in look the same as the
ones you use:
% readelf --syms ../../arm-eabi/lib
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #11 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
according to the contents of the "abfd" variable when the assert is raised,
it's caused by the stdin.o and fflush.o object files in libc.a, which both do
some weak symbol magic to pull in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #13 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7670
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7670&action=edit
testcase including all object files and stripped down libc.a
savefile.c in the testcase u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #14 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
Created attachment 7671
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7671&action=edit
standalone testcase including reduced libc sources
while trying to reduce the libc source
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7638|0 |1
is obsolete
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton ---
... and yet the testcase compiles and links without any problems:
% make
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -std=c99 -nostdinc -ffreestanding -g
-fno-stack-protector -c -o libc/__libc_start_main.o libc/__libc_start_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #17 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
the "host" (i.e. the machine the compiler runs on) is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
(sabotage linux using musl libc).
binutils 2.24 was built with these flags:
--target=arm-linux-musleabi
an
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #18 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the
latest testcase and pre-compiled musl-cross toolchain from
https://e82b27f594c813a5a4ea5b07b06f16c3777c3b8c.googl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #19 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
oops wrong link, the codesourcery toolchain which raised the assertion was
https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/package12813/public/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-2014.05-29-arm-none-lin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #20 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
(In reply to maillist-gdb from comment #18)
> i was able to reproduce the issue on a glibc box (opensuse 11.2) with the
> latest testcase
> i was, however able to reproduce the issue wit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #21 from Nick Clifton ---
I am sorry but this bug is just not reproducible with the FSF mainline binutils
sources. :-( I can only conclude that the bug must be something to do with
whatever patches CodeSourcery have applied to thei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #22 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
are you sure you're not using a hardfloat toolchain ? those seem to be immune
to the bug. anything else i tested is affected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7672|0 |1
is obsolete
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
--- Comment #24 from maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #21)
> I am sorry but this bug is just not reproducible with the FSF mainline
> binutils sources. :-( I can only conclude that the bug must be somet
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16698
maillist-gdb at barfooze dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Res
27 matches
Mail list logo
