https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e643cb45bf85fa5c8c49a89ff177de246af4212e
commit e643cb45bf85fa5c8c49a89ff1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #16 from Jon Turney ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14)
> The problem, I believe, is not the line number lookup code, but rather the
> bias computation code. This is performing a linear scan of the symbol table
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9953
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9953&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #13 from Jon Turney ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11)
> Have you tried using the latest binutils ? We did make some improvements to
> line number caching recent. (Although I think that this was with DWARF not
> STAB
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #12 from Jon Turney ---
Created attachment 9949
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9949&action=edit
example of a large object file demonstrating 'nm -l' slowdown
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Jon,
> Looking at the commit, even if the object isn't rebased, every symbol without
> linenumber information (e.g. type 'N' symbols) will cause an exhaustive,
> linear search for the symbol (I guess l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Jon Turney changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jon.turney at dronecode dot
org.uk
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #9 from Corinna Vinschen ---
Hi Nick,
thanks a lot for the patch. I'll look into getting a new binutils for
the Cygwin distro soon.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=425bd9e1bb32b25881dd20d76678d041f7bf04f8
commit 425bd9e1bb32b25881dd20d7667
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
> I assume that you still object to the patch, on the grounds that it is fixing
> a problem that is not the binutils fault?
No, no objections from me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Alan,
I assume that you still object to the patch, on the grounds that it is fixing
a problem that is not the binutils fault ?
One thing that did occur to me was that it might be useful to add a ne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Alan,
> This isn't a binutils problem. "rebase" isn't part of binutils,
True. It would be best if the rebase program correctly updated the DWARF debug
information itself. Although without relocs to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
17 matches
Mail list logo
