[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu h...@sourceware.org:

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu h...@sourceware.org:

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Hi Doug, fwiw, I'd prefer it if the tools didn't try to be clever like this by default. Such things can and do lead to confusion. OK - let's go with H.J.'s patch instead then.

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-21 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #7 from dje at google dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) Hi Doug, It is an artifact of the BFD library that objdump -h shows the uncompressed versions of compressed debug sections. It could be argues

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-19 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-04/msg00290.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8228|0 |1 is

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8253|0 |1 is

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.26 (HEAD)

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat