[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-14 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de -

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a82e3ef7ad90d9335c8f3801f06916ffed43327b commit a82e3ef7ad90d93

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 8897 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8897&action=edit kernel fix So the reason that CONFIG_RELOCATABLE (which is forced on by CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP) avoids the problem

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- I've reproduced lack of "TOC." in __versions. (Lots of WARNING: ".TOC." [*.ko] has no CRC! too.) "make defconfig" followed by turning off CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP and CONFIG_RELOCATABLE in .config does the trick,

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alan, Have you seen this bug report: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 > Summary: Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el > Quite a few symbols in kerne

[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2016-01-05 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[2.26 Regression] Missing |[2.26 Regression] Missing