[Bug binutils/19661] [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL

2016-04-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19661] [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL

2016-04-18 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 --- Comment #2 from njholcomb at wi dot rr.com --- Created attachment 9202 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9202&action=edit File displays locking without a memory operand. objdump -d lock_no_mem.o lock_no_mem.o: fi

[Bug binutils/19661] [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL

2016-02-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|